I've used a topology where small networked clusters (an enclave) each had a
gateway broker that was networked with the gateway brokers of other
enclaves. We configured the gateways so that only certain specific
destinations were allowed to forward through the gateways to the other
enclaves, based o
Erwin,
The NOB topology is very used, from my experience the most used in the
past years especially for redundancy and high availability. I regularly
deploy network of brokers with tens of brokers. It could go even higher,
but there's rarely enough traffic to justify that.
The topology is al
Hello,
I've implemented ActiveMQ with a distributed application using the
Network-of-Brokers (see
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html).
Now I'm trying to figure out whether Network-of-Brokers is a common pattern;
and on which scale it is actually used with other applications out th
ns";
class="org.apache.activemq.hooks.SpringContextHook"/>
/
Thanks you in advance!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-network-of-brokers-messages-are-not-balanced-tp4718074.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ve within the same
> master/slave group, but the same does not hold true for "cluster" given its
> ambiguity.
>
> Raffi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:5
ptember 29, 2015 12:55 AM
To: ActiveMQ Users
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Network of Brokers plus HA for messages [ EXTERNAL ]
Importance: High
They're mutually exclusive within a specific cluster of nodes, but you can
compose a network of brokers out of multiple master/slave cluster.
So (to pick a ran
gt;
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-plus-HA-for-messages-tp4702395.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-plus-HA-for-messages-tp4702395.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It's a Flash animation/video. There are various methods to save those, I
believe.
I suppose this is okay as long as you exercise strictly private and
personal use only.
Regards,
Raúl.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possibl
Hi
Is it possible to save it locally? Have you managed to do this?
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 30.12.2013 13:50, Raul Kripalani wrote:
Yeah, it's valuable insight.
Make sure you save it locally because AFAIK Progress Software no longer
holds any commercial interest in AMQ; therefore they may ta
Yeah, it's valuable insight.
Make sure you save it locally because AFAIK Progress Software no longer
holds any commercial interest in AMQ; therefore they may take down the
presentation anytime. It's just fortuitous that it's still publicly
available – if you ask me.
Regards,
Raúl.
On Mon, Dec 30
Il 29/12/2013 23:50, Bilgin Ibryam ha scritto:
Hi Enrico,
in case you haven't seen it yet, this old video has very useful tips for
performance and capability:
Performance tuning for ActiveMQ by Rob Davies.
http://download.progress.com/5331/open/adobe/prc/psc/perf_tuning_activemq/index.htm
Hop
Hi Enrico,
in case you haven't seen it yet, this old video has very useful tips for
performance and capability:
Performance tuning for ActiveMQ by Rob Davies.
http://download.progress.com/5331/open/adobe/prc/psc/perf_tuning_activemq/index.htm
Hope you find it useful,
On 29 December 2013 19:1
Hi,
I'm looking for something like ActiveMQ in action, but covering the most
recent features of AMQ
I'm currently using AMQ 5.8 and I would like to upgrade to 5.9
I'm going to extend my simple master-slave (2 brokers) setup to a more
complex network of brokers, because the load in my applicatio
.
btw, you should be asking these types of questions on the user list instead of
the dev list since this is a user type question.
>
> From: turkuaz07
>To: d...@activemq.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 6:35 AM
>Subject: ActiveMQ Net
I restart brokers. I have tried to set networkTTL="4" and
>duplex="true" on the broker network connector, but it doesn't work.
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-network-of-brokers-don-t-forward-messages
start brokers. I have tried to set networkTTL="4" and
duplex="true" on the broker network connector, but it doesn't work.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-network-of-brokers-don-t-forward-messages-back-tp4664973.html
Sent from th
ctor, but it doesn't work.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-network-of-brokers-don-t-forward-messages-back-tp4664973.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
it's transport connectors and will wait for the lock.
>
> Like you now mention that I have to have two shared database and two nodes
> of Master / Slave, I can acheive NOB. The point is clarified.
>
> Thanks for helping me out!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message i
r the lock.
Like you now mention that I have to have two shared database and two nodes
of Master / Slave, I can acheive NOB. The point is clarified.
Thanks for helping me out!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655446.html
rokers?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655444.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for the reply. Can you explain me why that with a shared file system I
cannot have a network of brokers?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655444.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
seMBClusterFaultTolerenceNetwork.html
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655442.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/docs/broker/5.5/clustering/FuseMBClusterFaultTolerenceNetwork.html
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655442.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
essage in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655439.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
But isn't configuring the networkConnectors with a static discovery in the
activemq.xml configuration file is a network of brokers?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655439.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User ma
d balancing?
>
> When the Slave does not even have its transport connectors started, how
> could the Master load balance the messages that it gets? I somehow do not
> understand the idea behind it.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.n
e.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I found an old message on this mailing list stating:
>>I don't want to load balance across brokers; I want sticky load
balancing
>>across consumers, with failover. I have a network-of-brokers. The
message
>>groups documentation (http://activemq.apache.org/message-groups.html)
says I
>>can use
rewall) and I
>>> have
>>> multicast configuration between these two
>>> Now I want to use all these 4 connected to each other across the
>>> firewall.
>>> How would i connect one set of brokers to other set of brokers. I know I
>>> need to u
or both these set of brokers and use that in my static
>> configuration of network of brokers?
>>
>> Please suggest
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/activemq-network-of-brokers-tp28552663p28552663.html
>> Sent from the ActiveM
s. I know I
> need to use static configutaion here
> But what would be the ip address to be used . Can I create a multicast
> address for both these set of brokers and use that in my static
> configuration of network of brokers?
>
> Please suggest
> --
> View this message in cont
brokers and use that in my static
configuration of network of brokers?
Please suggest
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/activemq-network-of-brokers-tp28552663p28552663.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
33 matches
Mail list logo
