Re: ActiveMQ, Clustered JBoss and JDBC Master/Slave

2007-06-29 Thread dooart
Sambit, we gave up doing it this way. We have tried JBossMQ too, but we faced very similar persistence issues, so we arrived at the conclusion that JMS itself was not a very good choice to manage the nodes of a cluster. We've ended up using JGroups to implement an IP-multicast based cluster manage

Re: ActiveMQ, Clustered JBoss and JDBC Master/Slave

2007-06-22 Thread James Strachan
Why do you need more than one broker BTW? A single broker can happily load balance messages across a cluster of MDBs. For HA use a pair of Master/Slave brokers On 6/22/07, sambit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Thiago, We were also trying to use a similar set up with Jboss and ActiveMQ Embedded

Re: ActiveMQ, Clustered JBoss and JDBC Master/Slave

2007-06-22 Thread sambit
Hi Thiago, We were also trying to use a similar set up with Jboss and ActiveMQ Embedded broker. We are facing same issues as you have mentioned. I'm wondering could you finally able to resolve this and can you suggest what is the best practice to use ActiveMQ broker, Jboss, MDB for a highly scal