Re: ActiveBlaze

On 29 Sep 2009, at 10:53, hermain wrote: Hi, Does anyone know when ActiveBlaze will be released ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-tp25660050p25660050.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ActiveBlaze will

ActiveBlaze

Hi, Does anyone know when ActiveBlaze will be released ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-tp25660049p25660049.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ActiveBlaze

Hi, Does anyone know when ActiveBlaze will be released ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-tp25660050p25660050.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveBlaze with .NET

to Java, and we need something like ActiveBlaze as we have high throughput requirements. I'd like to deploy ActiveBlaze to begin with, is this possible with the .NET clients or not? Thanks, Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-with-.NET-tp24366834p24366834.ht

Re: ActiveBlaze with .NET

we want to stabilize the Java client first > > cheers, > > Rob > > On 7 Jul 2009, at 05:04, tnine wrote: > >> >> Hi all, >> I've recently had to pick up an existing .NET project. It's in C# >> 3.5. >> It's far too large to

Re: ActiveBlaze with .NET

arge to convert to Java, and we need something like ActiveBlaze as we have high throughput requirements. I'd like to deploy ActiveBlaze to begin with, is this possible with the .NET clients or not? Thanks, Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-with-.NET

ActiveBlaze with .NET

Hi all, I've recently had to pick up an existing .NET project. It's in C# 3.5. It's far too large to convert to Java, and we need something like ActiveBlaze as we have high throughput requirements. I'd like to deploy ActiveBlaze to begin with, is this possible with the