Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-and-message-selector-Active-MQ-version-5-4-tp4690572.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

is added, that could lead to some terrible performance > scenarios. > > To the original use-case, can separate queues be used instead? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-and-message-selector-Active-MQ-version-5-4-tp4690692p4690727.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-and-message-selector-Active-MQ-version-5-4-tp4690692p4690727.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

test the behavior myself, but would that always be consistent? Does > Active MQ has a clear working on priority and message selection? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-and-message-selector-Active-MQ-version-5-4-tp4690692.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

emq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-and-message-selector-Active-MQ-version-5-4-tp4690692.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ version 5.X - java 5 - memory leaks

tic queues, will all the leaks in the broker be solved? If i create a new connection for each request process, should this solve the problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-version-5.X---java-5---memory-leaks-tp16122693s2354p16122693.html Sent from th

Re: Active MQ version 5.X - java 5 - memory leaks

will there be fixes for these problems? If i will use a static queues, will all the leaks in the broker be solved? If i create a new connection for each request process, should this solve the problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-version-5.X---java-5

Re: Active MQ version 5.X - java 5 - memory leaks

se problems, when will there be >> fixes for >> these problems? >> >> If i will use a static queues, will all the leaks in the broker be >> solved? >> >> If i create a new connection for each request process, should this >> solve the >&

Re: Active MQ version 5.X - java 5 - memory leaks

process, should this solve the problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-version-5.X---java-5---memory-leaks-tp16122693s2354p16122693.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Active MQ version 5.X - java 5 - memory leaks

fixes for these problems? If i will use a static queues, will all the leaks in the broker be solved? If i create a new connection for each request process, should this solve the problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-version-5.X---java-5---memory-leaks

Re: Active MQ Version

On 3/13/07, Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Active MQ Users , I am using active mq 4.0.2, along with Java 1.5.09 and Tomcat 5.5.20 . What is the most stable version of active mq , to which I can upgrade to ? . Our application uses Topic Publishers and

Active MQ Version

Hello Active MQ Users , I am using active mq 4.0.2, along with Java 1.5.09 and Tomcat 5.5.20 . What is the most stable version of active mq , to which I can upgrade to ? . Our application uses Topic Publishers and Durable subscribers. Please let me know. thanks, Suchitha