d emphasis like doing a kill -9 on activemq broker and recovering
from that.
This would help fight FUD and give ActiveMQ the stability desired from a
user prespective while allowing for rapid development of new features.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/About-releases-and-bugs-
ts a bit of an exaggeration & a comment thats hardly likely to get
the volunteers on the list to help you solve your particular issues.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/About-releases-and-bugs-tf3987476s2354.html#a11363047
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > Authentication and security should be mandatory, but the
> ActiveMQ.Agent feature doesn't work if auth is enabled.
>
> I'm not aware of any any MOM where authentication and security are
> mandatory out of the box; its usually always some
On 6/28/07, Manuel Teira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Davies escribió:
> ActiveMQ is deployed and used in lots of different scenarios. Given
> the breadth of the project, its very difficult for a few people to
> cover everything - which is why we encourage folks to participate and
> help us out
On 6/28/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have to agree with most of this. ActiveMQ is a buggy as hell.
Thats a bit of an exaggeration & a comment thats hardly likely to get
the volunteers on the list to help you solve your particular issues.
In my testing, I'd have to sa
Rob Davies escribió:
ActiveMQ is deployed and used in lots of different scenarios. Given
the breadth of the project, its very difficult for a few people to
cover everything - which is why we encourage folks to participate and
help us out ;)
And we are willing to help.
I know this is a complex
ActiveMQ is deployed and used in lots of different scenarios. Given
the breadth of the project, its very difficult for a few people to
cover everything - which is why we encourage folks to participate and
help us out ;)
On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:19 AM, Tom Samplonius wrote:
I have to agre
I have to agree with most of this. ActiveMQ is a buggy as hell.
In my testing, I'd have to say ActiveMQ 4.1.1 is completely unusable in
production. I'm told that it is used in production somewhere, but I suspect
the usage is extremely narrow. I'd like to know what usage actually works.
Hello.
I will try to outline briefly our situation as activemq users:
We are embedding a 4.0.2 broker in our system. It is suffering some
problems:
- Memory leaks.
- Locks trying to create or delete temporary queues (AMQ-1278). Still
trying to reproduce it to verify this bug as fixed for us.
