Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status

2007-02-23 Thread James Strachan
On 2/23/07, drvillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rob thanks for the quick reply will you announce when you branch 4.1 and 5? Its already done Here's 4.1... https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/branches/activemq-4.1/ here's what will be 5.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/trunk

Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status

2007-02-23 Thread drvillo
ostponing the date in the hope to release >> >> with >> >> - a more stable version of AMQ (currently it's packaged with a >> >> month old >> >> trunk rev.) >> >> - kaha storing indexes on the filesystem rather than in memo

Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status

2007-02-23 Thread James Strachan
but how >> about the quality of the codebase? >> >> Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations >> for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each >> checkout:) >> >> Cheers >> Francesco >> >> >> -- >> View this me

Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status

2007-02-23 Thread drvillo
exes on the filesystem rather than in memory >> - and to get rid of this backport-util-concurrent.jar >> >> Now I read that the jar has been tossed out, but how >> about the quality of the codebase? >> >> Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations &g

Re: AMQ 4.2 status

2007-02-23 Thread Rob Davies
lot for the feedback, and congratulations for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each checkout:) Cheers Francesco -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status- tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

AMQ 4.2 status

2007-02-23 Thread drvillo
tting better at each checkout:) Cheers Francesco -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.