lets move this discussion to the dev list then...
I just created a report to help cherry-picking on main.. and a dev
thread discussing what to do.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 8:41 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet wrote:
>
> Hello,
> For WildFly we still support Java 8 and having a maintenance release with
>
Hello,
For WildFly we still support Java 8 and having a maintenance release with some
fixes would be great:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3620
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3607
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3541
Maybe I could help with this ma
> Indeed, own Artemis releases will always be an option, but there are few
> drawbacks I can see with this approach:
> - It will be an unofficial release and clients who receive software with this
> unofficial library will be naturally cautious about it;
> - Since it will be a private release it
officially released as part of
2.19.x.
Thanks,
Viktor
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bertram
Sent: 22 December 2021 17:18
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] JDK 1.8 support for ActiveMQ Artemis
In my opinion only the most critical fixes involving security or stability
In my opinion only the most critical fixes involving security or stability
should be back-ported.
That said, I think we'd need more than just a single user here to warrant
the effort to back-port and perform releases. Of course, in an ideal world
the folks who actually need the fixes & releases wo
I wonder what should qualify for the cherry picking.
One thing I must ask. To always use cherry pick -x
I have a report tooling that would help to XREF the branches.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:00 AM Viktor Kolomeyko
wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to cast my vote supporting 2.19.x branch for J
Hello,
I would like to cast my vote supporting 2.19.x branch for JDK 1.8 users.
We do have a version of our product which is still running on JRE 1.8 and we do
need some critical fixes to be applied.
In particular, I would want to see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3593 to be inclu
I just sent ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 to be reviewed under Vote. and I
would like to clarify that JDK 1.8 will not be supported any more from
Artemis 2.20.0
At this point I don't think we need to create a 2.19.x branch for JDK
1.8 Users.
I would like to hear from anyone who can't move to JDK 11 he
