Re: [Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-02-04 Thread mkeenan
61626,tcp://localhost:61636 components[2] == tcp://localhost:61636 This fails downstream because the port number cannot be parsed. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-using-FailoverTransport-tp21303879p21833315.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-02-02 Thread Jim Gomes
k;and when > the broker start up,the client application will continue. >The conclusion is that the broker uri list in failover transport must be > bracketed even when there is only one uri. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-using-Fail

Re: [Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-01-31 Thread wangchao
the client application will blok;and when the broker start up,the client application will continue. The conclusion is that the broker uri list in failover transport must be bracketed even when there is only one uri. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.Acti

Re: [Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-01-30 Thread semog
unning.Is this a correct > using for failoverTransport?If so,what's wrong with my code above? > > thanks > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-using-FailoverTransport-tp21303879p21750420.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-01-05 Thread wangchao
is message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-using-FailoverTransport-tp21303879p21303879.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.