11:41 AM
To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS)
Subject: EXT :Re: CMS Library Hangs On Message Send
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 07:55 -0700, urciolo wrote:
> Hello, we are using the latest CMS library to talk to ActiveMQ
> 5.5.0-fuse-00-43. Some times the CMS clients hang on a message send. The
> stack
Hello, we are using the latest CMS library to talk to ActiveMQ
5.5.0-fuse-00-43. Some times the CMS clients hang on a message send. The
stack trace is attached from a process stuck on a Solaris 8 box. Do you
have any ideas as to why this is happening?
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/
is enabled) structure to hold
the messages that are waiting to be dispatched.
From: Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ]
[mailto:ml-node+3713800-2029387266-139...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:15 PM
To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS)
Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43
If
(to
prevent me from breaking something).
I see prioritization in the code in other area, such as the
PrioritizedPendingList class. I am not sure if that interacts with the
messages pending dispatch in any way. I could not see an interaction.
Kevin
From: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS)
Sent: Friday
I changed from a listener to a consumer.receive and set the prefetch to 0. The
behavior is the same as with the message listener and prefetch set to 1.
From: Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ]
[mailto:ml-node+3702690-1621008114-139...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 6:17 PM
To: Urciolo
umer consumer = (ActiveMQMessageConsumer)
consumerSession.createConsumer(dest);
From: Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ]
[mailto:ml-node+3696786-639262666-139...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:39 PM
To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS)
Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43
so that is not exp
-639262666-139...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:39 PM
To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS)
Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43
so that is not expected. Have a peek over one of the message priority
test cases to see if there is something different from your scenario,
you
+3696461-369868383-139...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:38 PM
To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS)
Subject: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43
if you have concurrent producers and consumers, then the prefetch has
an effect as a consumer will get a batch of messages which will get
I am testing out message priority in 5.5.0-fuse-00-43.
I have prioritization enabled, and a maxPageSize of 5000. When I consume
230 messages with priorities 0-9, almost all of them are consumed in the
correct priority. However, the last 20 or so seem to start the priority
consumption over again.
We are using ActiveMQ 5.4.1. It seems when using SSL to connect to a remote
broker (while having a non-SSl local broker), reconnections always go to
localhost and not the remote broker. This is only the case with the SSL
transport. The TCP transport seems to work correctly.
One thing I noticed
I have a situation where older messages are blocking the delivery of newer
messages in a queue. A consumer is using a message selector that matches
the newer messages, but not the older messages. This seems to happen with
just a couple of thousand messages that do not match the message selector.
Is there a way with Bitronix to reference redelivery policies and prefetch
policies using the driver properties?
orderedfailover:tcp://localhost:61616
I would like to programmatically enable advisory topics
(ActiveMQ.Advisory.MessageConsumed.Queue) for specific queues at runtime on
a Broker running in a separate VM.
Is there a way to attach to a remote broker and enable certain advisory
topics programmatically?
--
View this message in context:
13 matches
Mail list logo
