Hi, any updates on this issue? I believe this problem is also apparent in
JBoss AS 4.2 and JBoss 5.
khudalla wrote:
>
> Okay, I have implemented the changes based on the SVN trunk and have
> posted a patch in JIRA for issue AMQ-765. I have been successfully testing
> the RA now on glassfish v2
Hi All,
Any updates on this issue, that is, is it already incorporated on any
release of ActiveMQ?
I am currently using ActiveMQ 5.3.0 and set up ActiveMQ with JBoss 5 using
JCA RA. Reading through this email thread, I think I have encountered the
same issue with ActiveMQ and JBoss. I also encoun
("activemq/queue/outbound");
...
If it's not too much to ask, are there any readings that describe the
configuration of ActiveMQ through JNDI?
- Pat
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 17:56 -0800, thinkbox wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have embe
I see, thanks a lot Tim!
I will try to use the physical name on my C++ client.
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 17:56 -0800, thinkbox wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have embedded an ActiveMQ broker in JBoss and bind the JMS destination
>> through JBos
Hi All,
I have embedded an ActiveMQ broker in JBoss and bind the JMS destination
through JBoss JNDI. My Java JMS clients is sending to this destination
through JNDI. On the other end, my C++ JMS clients would need to connect to
the said destination. My question is, how can I search for that JNDI
Hi All,
I have solved this issue by replacing localhost (say tcp://localhost:61616)
to my actual IP address.
thinkbox wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have followed the tutorial found at
> http://activemq.apache.org/integrating-apache-activemq-with-jboss.html
> Integrating Activ
Hi All,
I have followed the tutorial found at
http://activemq.apache.org/integrating-apache-activemq-with-jboss.html
Integrating ActiveMQ with JBoss . I was able to successfully test the
integration with the examples included with the ActiveMQ distribution.
I am using ActiveMQ-CPP in order to u
I see..
Thanks a lot Tim!
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 22:57 -0800, thinkbox wrote:
>> I see, that makes sense, I get the point.
>> Thanks Tim!
>>
>> - Pat
>>
>> X.S. Just a side comment. Having said that ActiveMQ C++ cannot supp
now?
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 19:20 -0800, thinkbox wrote:
>> Hi Nate, I am also in the same situation with Joshua and is currently
>> considering ActiveMQ-CPP for my C++ clients to be able to talk to my Java
>> components. I am currently using versi
