Because the errors occured on the ActiveMQ Connection, I guess activemq could
be the main cause of that.
However it also has influence on the netty time out, servicemix and even
runtime environments.
In my test case, about 200 of data per a second are sent by the socket
client and it is also cri
rdered strictly.
Thank you so much for two helpful comments.
sic
Ivan Pechorin wrote:
>
>> So it's fine without correlation ID because the producer waits for reply
>> message not on the static queue but on the temporary queue registered in
>> the
>> JMSReplyTo header
trate with some kind of test case, I'll try to do it.
I think blob messages are able to be browsed as the other type of messages
can do.
regards,
sic
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Browsing-Blob-Messages-from-JMX-tp29169270p29169270.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Us
an't find any
appropriate forum for that issue.
I hope anybody informs me of this concept.
regards,
sic
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/correlation-ID-on-synchronous-message-tp29105526p29105526.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Then, I decide either not to use them or to implement a way of failover for
my requirement.
Anyway, thank you for informing the current states.
sic
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>
> Hi Sic,
>
> failover for blob upload transfer policy is not curr
fileserver/"/>
I appreciate any advice for this issue.
regards,
sic
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/blob-messages-with-failover-transport-tp29072071p29072071.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
have more control
> over it.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4
hat's because the other type of messages(without blob) have no disturbance
although jetty webserver gets abnormal status.
Is it possible to do that in the current version?
I appreciate any advice for that issue.
regards,
sic
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/shutdow
to increase inflight
count.
Any misconception about the DLQ handling for me or alternative ways?
appreciate any comments about this subject.
regards,
sic
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/DLQ-Handling-tp28663453p28663453.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
viewpoint of Queue but topic doesn't do, I think.
Any advice about my thinking?
sic
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Entire-Subscription-Recovery-Policy-tp28431701p28431701.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
edege exception can occur in 3 cases(start of
ack, end of ack, different count) at a source, I cannot understand why it is
generated.
regards,
sic
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/reason-for-Unmatched-acknowledege-tp27026961p27026961.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User ma
lready set?
because connections and sessions, I think, are already pooled and reused by
Connection Factory, cachelevel is of no effect.
Or I may completely misunderstand the cacheLevel and pooled connection in
DMLC.
regards,
sic
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/cachelevel-and-po
a jira issue [1] for this (include as much of this
>> detail as possible) and I will try and get it into 5.3
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa
>>
>> 2009/7/9 sic :
>>>
>>> The problem still occured in the la
sumptions about the type of message.
> A junit test case would help lots.
>
>
>
> 2009/7/7 sic
>
>>
>> While expired messages remain on queue, server cannot be re-started with
>> ClassCastException until I delete persistent file(e.g. file :
>> data\kr-store
that all of messages on specified queue have
been purged regardless of expiration.
Does anyone have other ways?
sic wrote:
>
> While testing ActiveMQ5.2.0, I have a question about expired message.
>
> Note that testing messages are Persistent and using a queue, set message
> exp
While testing ActiveMQ5.2.0, I have a question about expired message.
Note that testing messages are Persistent and using a queue, set message
expiration time to 10 seconds. configurations are same except destination
policy(using a vm queue cursor) as below
16 matches
Mail list logo