Sorry, for CMS, the base version I tested with was V3.4.5 -- and not V3.4.0).
S
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Testing-Java-vs-CMS-C-consumer-CMS-is-much-slower-any-ideas-please-tp4659653p4659654.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
I’ve found a significant performance difference using Qs between Java and
CMS/C++ consumers.
Environment:
Windows 2008R2, Opteron @ 2.4GHz (lots of cores)
Everything is 64-bit: JDK 1.7.0_02 & C++ compiled with VS.NET 2010 (as
Release/x64)
ActiveMQ V5.7.0:
persistent=false
We're trying to use ActiveMQ as the queue for a distributed set of
calculation servers (think many machines with 64-cores on-board).
Imagine a single queue with N consumers. The only efficient way to scale is
to use consumer prefetch. However. Each of our messages can take between
3ms and minut
