Hi Raj,
Could you suggest which version of 5.0 i can use to see if this works fine
for me.
Regards
-Sambit
rajdavies wrote:
>
> this is a known issue - but has only been fixed in 5.0
>
> On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:59 AM, sambit wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Naga,
>>
Hi Naga,
Did you get any solution to this ?
Regards
-Sambit
naga007 wrote:
>
> Currently iam running activemq version 4.1.1 in Master Slave mode. When i
> failover from master to slave it seems like some of the messages are being
> redelivered. Is this a known issue or any
Hi,
Did you find a solution to this?
Regards
-Sambit
William Blackburn-2 wrote:
>
> I'm out of my depth - and I apologize for posting this on both lists,
> but I am desperate.
>
> I have configured ActiveMQ in a Master/Slave arrangement according to
> the
e any plan in near future to
have an option of integrating the persistence mechanism to a distributed
caching framework like JDBC Adapater or Journal Adapter.
Regards
-Sambit
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> What version of ActiveMQ are you using? Using topics/queues? Do you
> have slow consum
file storage.
Could you please give some pointers to tackle this poblem. This is quite
important for us to take few strategic decision.
Regards
-Sambit
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> Try turning off asyncSend. Also this might help when you've done that
> http://activemq.apache.o
ighly scalable
and performant requirement.
Regards
-Sambit
dooart wrote:
>
> The other one is identical, except for the brokerName, that is
> brokderDELL07VM1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thiago
>
>
> rajdavies wrote:
>>
>> Hi Thiago,
>>
>>
