Hello Charles,
By chance, I'm investigating similar problem - connect multiple OSGi clients
and server. But I have requirement to allow bidirectional communication even
in case of NAT/Firewall.
IMHO, ActiveMQ with HTTP transport should not be compared to REST directly.
Choice depends on requirem
- http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:53 AM, roman hawk wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello, thanks for your response.
>>
>> I've checked HttpEmbeddedTunnelServlet.
>>
>>
om/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:34 AM, roman hawk wrote:
>
>>
>> I've the following use case:
>>
I've the following use case:
According to ActiveMQ docs and code, it is possible to open http transport
from broker. Jetty server is started inside HttpTransportServer. Listener
from HttpTransportServer is registered in HttpTunnelServlet, which is
started inside Jetty.
I have an embedded broker.
