Looks like failover transport is the answer...Testing it out...
rmenon wrote:
>
> Hi folks!
> If we have to bounce activemq, do we have to do something special at the
> client (where messages are being sent or received) to ensure that after
> the bounce new messages are sent
Hi folks!
If we have to bounce activemq, do we have to do something special at the
client (where messages are being sent or received) to ensure that after the
bounce new messages are sent and/or received automatically? Messages lost in
between are acceptable to us.
Thanx!
Menon
--
View this mess