Thank Tim. I thought maybe the way I phrased the questions came across
offensive or something.
And thanks for the clarification about the polling vs. broadcasting.
I will have to see if we can maybe enable multicast. I don't see the
"backup" property on the discovery transport though and I am not
Bad day? Relax Tim. Not trying to offend anyone here.
It's not about me not wanting to tweak the log4j. I just didn't want to
suppress the TransportDisposedIOException (or DemandForwardingBridgeSupport)
if it happens for a different reason.
And I was not clear enough about the previous versions: I
Figured out the problem with 2. The client had a network timeout of 30
seconds. Every producer and consumer creates its own connection and session
and that caused the problems. Reducing the timeout solved issue 2.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi,
I have a network of 4 brokers, statically configured (). Each broker has
a list if IPs, excluding its own.
It is expected that not all brokers are running at the same time (they can,
but don't have to).
I have (java) clients that run on the same machines as the brokers and
connect to their loca
We actually use more than 2 nodes, but still an even amount.
About the prime-time ready: A consultant told me that some functionality was
missing.
Maybe I will look into Artemis.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
:)
You are right. And you are wrong.
I DON'T want persistent messaging via KhahaDB (or jdbc). I don't want to
introduce a database, a NAS or shared folders (I'm on windows).
I DO want in memory behavior similar to it, where two brokers share their
messages (in memory) so that if both brokers die, m
Thanks guys.
I am a little hesitant since I heard that artemis is not really prime-time
ready yet.
But I might give it a shot.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Thank you both for your answers.
Yes, Justin, that's what I meant (non-persistent messaging).
I guess, I will have to look into different solutions.
Is it for example possible to force messages to be always sent to a local
consumer, if one exists, otherwise to a remote consumer (if one exists and
Hi,
I am trying to solve a problem and I am wondering if Virtual Topics provide
a solution for the problem.
I have 2 brokers in a network of brokers.
Broker A has a producer to VirtualTopic.Test and a local consumer
Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.Test (lets call it consumer A).
Broker B has a local consum
