Limited Memory Usage for Embedded Broker

ActiveMQ release 5.0.0 and a simple stomp client. The example of embedded broker released with ActiveMQ should be able to demonstrate the memory usage limit mentioned above. If anybody has any suggestion/solution, please do. Regards, Panu -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com

Journalled JDBC Master/Slave Performance Issue

activemq.log.case.02 Regards, Panu -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Journalled-JDBC-Master-Slave-Performance-Issue-tf4292542s2354.html#a12219809 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

A few issues with Stomp

JMSXGroupFirstForConsumer = true. Also, sometimes, the same consumer is chosen instead of a new consumer. Normally, I use SNAPSHOT version 4.2-20070513.230550-57, but I also tested with SNAPSHOT version 5.0-20070815.220536-52, and I found these issues in both versions. Regards, Panu -- View this message in

Behaviour of composite destination when a target destination was not created

send a message to a not-yet-created destination). Cheers, Panu -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Behaviour-of-composite-destination-when-a-target-destination-was-not-created-tf3962269s2354.html#a11244727 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Are messages lost if a stomp producer is quick

messages are received. I do browse the queue and the number of messages is equal to the number shown in the statistics, which is fewer than 100. Regards, Panu -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Are-messages-lost-if-a-stomp-producer-is-quick-tf3745413s2354.html#a10613906 Sent

Are messages lost if a stomp producer is quick

result. Therefore, I would like to know, if someone could please answer: - Is my stomp producer supposed to pause always? - Is ActiveMQ supposed to be able to handle this situation? Regards, Panu -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Are-messages-lost-if-a