Ping to tickle the forum.
Bueller? ... Bueller?
I made an interesting observation over the weekend that may help explain
what's going on here, but need some assistance.
I've modified my spring configuration to use a PooledConnectionFactory. I'm
using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and the 1.1 JMS APIs (He
I made an interesting observation over the weekend that may help explain
what's going on here, but need some assistance.
I've modified my spring configuration to use a PooledConnectionFactory. I'm
using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and the 1.1 JMS APIs (Hence JMSTemplate replacing
JMSTemplate102). Here's
's nothing flagrantly wrong with the peer URI?
Should it be the same URI in both peers (I assume so). There's no explicit
broker configuration that needs be done?
Thanks for taking a look at this, Rob.
-chris
Hi new2mq,
I wonder if you're running into some gotcha's with
's no explicit
broker configuration that needs be done?
Thanks for taking a look at this, Rob.
-chris
Hi new2mq,
I wonder if you're running into some gotcha's with the Spring
JmsTemplate - and that you should be using a PooledConnectionFactory -
see http://activemq.apache.org/spri
ne and ant runSender on the other.
You should see the runSender instance both sending and receiving messages.
The "run" instance never gets the messages. If you run both on the same
machine, both instances receive the messages.
-chris http://www.nabble.com/file/p18759336/testamq.jar
otocol works if both apps are on the same LAN subnet. In other
> case, you'll have to configure your network statically.
>
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
>
>
> http://www.ttmsolutions.com - get a free ActiveMQ user guide
>
> http://www.scriptinginjava.net
>
>
>
I have what I think *must* be a simple and common deployment architecture.
I have two webapps running on different machines.At any given time, one
will receive an http request that generates an MQ message. I want the
other webapp on the other machine to automatically receive this message a
