;
>
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:48 PM, manishbel wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> We are using Jdbc Master/Slave setup for our application, when the
>> database
>> is brought down when the application is still running the
>> DefaultDatabaseLocker for the slave is
Hello
We are using Jdbc Master/Slave setup for our application, when the database
is brought down when the application is still running the
DefaultDatabaseLocker for the slave is flooding the logs complaining about
it being unable to acquire the lock as the database is down, i think it
would be n
nector
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On Oct 11, 2007, at 4:44 PM, manishbel wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for the reply Rob,
>>
>> Any pointers towards how can i setup destinations individually to
>> pr
destinations you want to be propagated around the network - if you
> don't want to use advisories (though they are good!)
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On Oct 10, 2007, at 11:24 PM, manishbel wrote:
>
>
Hi All,
When i turn off the Advisory Support the Network of Brokers doesn't work. Is
it mandatory to have it on for it to work? i thought it was more for the
Monitoring purposes. I am using multicast for discovery.
Thanks
Manish
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Advisory-
Hello
First of all sorry if my messages are too annoying or naive but i am trying
to get some help on various issues that i am facing. We're trying to use the
directory persistence for our testing envrionment and when we brought the
broker up it failed, when we looked into the locgs we saw the fo
I have a consumer that's consuming messages at about 6msgs/sec and after i
sent about 15000 messages i got the following exception
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.util.LinkedList.addBefore(LinkedList.java:635)
at java.util.LinkedList.addFirst(LinkedList.java:153)
at
Sorry, my bad, i figured that activemq is doing the select for update to lock
it and once the connection is gone the lock's gone too. in my case it was
hanging because there was another broker connected to it from some other
machine.
Manish.
manishbel wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
Hello,
My broker is configured to use the JournaledJdbc which by default allows the
Master/Slave behavior, i have set the start flag to false so that the broker
is not started automatically by the context as i want to start the broker
asynchronously in its own thread so that the other slaves in t
Hello
I am using ActiveMQ4.1.1 and running the Master/Slave Setup and to test it i
run the receivers in my clustered environment and the producer on my local
machine when i bring the Master down my producer sometimes hangs. I also
have a TransportListener that is not getting notified.
Here
Yes...although i forgot to mention that when connection is active the
onCommand of the class handling the consumer is called.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 8/7/07, manishbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I have been trying out TransportLis
Hello
I have been trying out TransportListener in my application, I basically have
Class1 - that has the producer and acts as the Transport Listener.
Class2 - that uses the consumer to receive the messages, this acts as a
Transport Listener too.
When i bring the broker down the Class1 that a
I have:
- Jdbc Master Slave brokers setup in a weblogic cluster.
- Each instance has set of receivers/consumer consuming message from queues
with exclusive consumer
behavior so at a time any one of the cluster instance will be receiving
and processing all the messages.
- the receivers use co
Hello
My Goals are
1.) Use the embedded broker configured as spring bean in the application.
2.) To be able to use the Master/Slave behaviour
3.) Deploy the application in the weblogic cluster.
I have configured the broker to use the databse lock, at the moment one of
the cluster instances come
14 matches
Mail list logo