There is a message posted in the user forum back in early 2006 regarding the
limitation on the configuration of a network of brokers
(http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers-...-tf1117526s2354.html#a2921710).
The post suggests any topology involving cyclic graph may result in
duplicate messages
Using the 5.0 Snapshot, I am getting the following exceptions in the brokers:
Setup:
- Start three brokers using multi-cast as the discovery protocol with
names of: sender, receiver, receiver2.
The XML configuration used is similar to the one found in
activemq-core/src/test/resou
t may loss messages as a
result.
Therefore, I'll assume #2 is not possilbe in this case, and a message client
must specify failover as the protocol and spell out the list of hosts in the
master / slave pairs?
Kit Plummer wrote:
>
> ksu wrote:
>> Is it possible to have a Ne
Is it possible to have a Network of Brokers where each of the brokers is a
cluster of (File sharing) Master / Slave cluster?
The idea here to to build a system that has good performance characteristics
and can be scaled easily by simply adding more brokers.
I see a couple of potential issues
I am having trouble getting the JMS-2-JMS2 function to work with Oracle
AQ/JMS.
To test this, I basically modified the junit test code
activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/network/jms/TopicBridgeSpringTest.java
The only differences are:
- The remote connection factory
- The re
