Re: Can I run Performance Module from desktop to measure brokers on remote host?

com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:57 PM, jzhang wrote: >> >> I am trying to run perf test >> (http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html) >> to benchmark brokers. I ran: >> &

Can I run Performance Module from desktop to measure brokers on remote host?

I am trying to run perf test (http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html) to benchmark brokers. I ran: mvn activemq-perf:broker -Durl=broker:tcp://lab_host.mycompany.com:61617 It throws error: Loading message broker from: broker:tcp://lab_host.mycompany.com:61617 E

How do I run maven command to run performance module?

I am trying to run performance module from my desktop to measure broker performance (brokers are on Linux VMs). I followed steps from http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html to build amq from source and ran 'mvn clean install' from 'activemq-tooling'. But the follo

Re: Network of brokers dynamic discovery and directional question

ward their > messages to the target. > > On 6 August 2010 22:58, jzhang wrote: >> >> When configuring network of brokers using dynamic discovery such as >> multicast, does that mean the directional is 'duplex' by nature or still >> one-way?

Re: Can I can run two brokers as network using multicast on the same host?

oup=mygroup&useLocalHost=false > > On 9 August 2010 19:17, jzhang wrote: >> >> Thanks for the reply. I have added this property to the xml: >> >> transportConnectors> >>           > uri="tcp://myhost.mycompany.com:61617" >> discoveryUri

Re: Can I can run two brokers as network using multicast on the same host?

=mygroup?useLocalHost=false" looks > odd, > the query string needs to use & to separate arguments, > it should be: > "multicast://default?group=mygroup&useLocalHost=false > > On 9 August 2010 19:17, jzhang wrote: >> >> Thanks for the reply. I have adde

Re: Can I can run two brokers as network using multicast on the same host?

ments at the end about useLocalHost=false > > On 5 August 2010 22:23, jzhang wrote: >> >> I am trying to set up a simple network of brokers within the same host >> (Linux >> VM) using multicast. It seems that I can only use 'localhost' as host >> name >&

Network of brokers dynamic discovery and directional question

When configuring network of brokers using dynamic discovery such as multicast, does that mean the directional is 'duplex' by nature or still one-way? The thing is that the networkConnector will only have multicast address and not other brokers: Am I mssing anything here? -J --

Re: Can I can run two brokers as network using multicast on the same host?

I figured this out. This is not the problem of running two brokers on the same host. It is a bug amq-2094 that the IP does not get taken correctly. I replaced host name with wild card address "0.0.0.0" and the warning disappears. -J -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Can-I-

Can I can run two brokers as network using multicast on the same host?

I am trying to set up a simple network of brokers within the same host (Linux VM) using multicast. It seems that I can only use 'localhost' as host name in tcp uri. If I use IP address or DNS name, the log shows 'connection refused' warning message. Here are some details: My configurations: - fo

Problem when trying Pure Master/Slave without authentication

I am trying Pure Master/Slave without authentication for learning purpose. It appears that the slave can not connect to master. I have master 'bkr1' and slave 'bkr2'. The activemq.xml of 'bkr2' (the slave) looks like: The port 61613 is the one for master. I started m

Master/Slave and non-persistence message

Can Master/Slave be used for non-persistence message? It has persistent data storage needs to be configured so I am just wondering the data gets replicated is just the broker states and not for message persistence. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Master-Slave-and-non-persi

Can multiple brokers be running in one JMX context?

I am setting multiple standalone brokers on a host. They will be running from different JVM and also configured with JMX. I don't believe they can share the same JMX context since the port number should be unique for each one. My question is about the 'activemq-admin list' command. It says 'list t

'activemq-admin list' command does not return all running brokers

I installed two brokers on the server. They are all up running and with JMX configured. But when I ran 'activemq-admin list' command, it seems to attache the broker that was started at the latest. So only one broker is returned from the command. When I shutdown that one then the first one returned