Re: Persistent messages moving to DLQ when consumer not active

2014-01-24 Thread johnd
artnaseef wrote > Cool - you're welcome. > > Note that plugin may be valuable if your broker clocks ever get far > out-of-sync, so you might want to look more closely at why the plugin was > whacking the timeouts. Note that I'm saying this with only a brief look > at that code, so I can't say for

Re: How to use embedded and standalone broker bridged together?

2014-01-24 Thread johnd
artnaseef wrote > Is the embedded broker looking for messages on the Topic? Yes. artnaseef wrote > Keep in mind messages sent to a Topic are only ever dispatched to either > active subscriptions, or durable subscriptions. In fact, the broker never > stores messages for a Topic, but instead stor

Re: Persistent messages moving to DLQ when consumer not active

2014-01-24 Thread johnd
Yes it was! I must have added this by mistake when adding the logging plugins (from a cut and past!). Removing this solved the problem. Thank you very much for this! Regards, John -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Persistent-messages-moving-to-DLQ-when-co

Re: Persistent messages moving to DLQ when consumer not active

2014-01-23 Thread johnd
I have also tried replacing the 'preserveMessageQos=true' config option (on the camel routes/subscriptions) with 'disableTimeToLive=true' option,ie This seems to have no effect on the message expiration either - it is still being set. The only messages I can see with an expiration of 0 are those

Re: Persistent messages moving to DLQ when consumer not active

2014-01-23 Thread johnd
Some further info If I stop the standalone activemq broker/instance and look at the message in the queue on the side of the embedded broker, I can see the message has the correct expiration set: When I start the standalone broker, this message gets routed to the topic with the following came

Persistent messages moving to DLQ when consumer not active

2014-01-22 Thread johnd
Hi, I have an issue where persistent messages on a queue are being moved to the DLQ when there is no active consumer on the queue. I am not sure if this is an issue with activeMQ or Camel. The set-up is as follows: messages or put onto a queue in an embedded broker which is bridged to a standalon

How to use embedded and standalone broker bridged together?

2014-01-20 Thread johnd
Hi, I am having some problems setting-up an embedded broker to work correctly with a standalone broker via a static bridge - messages are getting lost. I am new to activeMQ so this is probably either a misunderstanding on my part or configuration problem. I have a standalone activeMQ instance whi