Re: Total Message Order of Queues (not topics) durring edge cases(crashes)

2009-08-07 Thread jerdavis
wrote: > > total ordering is only an issue when there are multiple consumers. > For a single consumer and for exclusive consumers, where there can only be > a > single consumer, ordering 'is' guaranteed. > > 2009/8/6 jerdavis > >> >> Thanks for your

Re: Total Message Order of Queues (not topics) durring edge cases(crashes)

2009-08-06 Thread jerdavis
guarantee Total Order? I would think that a new Exclusive consumer wouldn't be able to consume messages until the crashed TCP connection/consumer finally closed and released the outstanding messages. Regards, -JD rajdavies wrote: > > > On 5 Aug 2009, at 23:13, jerdavis w

Re: Total Message Order of Queues (not topics) durring edge cases(crashes)

2009-08-05 Thread jerdavis
No takers? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Total-Message-Order-of-Queues-%28not-topics%29-durring-edge-cases%28crashes%29-tp24705154p24837185.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Total Message Order of Queues (not topics) durring edge cases(crashes)

2009-07-28 Thread jerdavis
Hello all, If I configure activeMQ and JMS producer/consumer correctly, are there any cases where the total order of a queue is violated? I've seen this page: http://activemq.apache.org/total-ordering.html But I came across this post from 2005: http://www.devwebsphere.com/devwebsphere/2005/06/t