I couldn't see the limitQuery() support in the DefaultJDBCAdapter of AMQ5.10,
but it did arrive in AMQ5.13. Our system is currently on 5.10 so we
upgraded a test system to 5.13.4. I updated the jdbcPersistenceAdapter
element to look like this...
..
Nathan, I do have access to Oracle in dev/test so might be able to help with
your line of enquiry if you want to share some further thoughts and/or you
think it might expedite. Cheers all and thanks for sharing. We really
appreciate the work of all the good people in this community.
--
Sent fr
Got it. I'll try it today.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi Tim, in case you missed it, or in case I'm missing something..but
doesn't my stack trace confirm Oracle driver selection by the
oracle.jdbc.driver packages?
Cheers
Jason.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi, I have a customer running AMQ 5.10.0, JDBC persistence and no journalling
like the OP. We saw the same query as the OP last week..also during a
restart of the JBoss app server running AMQ embedded. Oracle AWR reports
showed this SQL was executed 14,000 times in 1 hour, effectively grindi
Hi Tim, we managed to attach a debugger as requested and the path you
identified does seem to be the one taken by the incorrect update to
ACTIVEMQ_ACKS table in respect of DC1. We took several stack dumps (text
below) at the different debug points you requested in case that also helps.
Note that
Tim, thanks for getting backwill do as you suggested and report back
soon.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Tim, we appreciate any and all help the community can offer and we'll do what
we can to help ourselves.
You are correct in that a repeat of the test with only DC1 results in the
same behaviour and outcome. Pending messages for DC1 are lost/deleted after
messages arrive on the same topic but whi
I missed the word "our" in your response which I now take to mean ActiveMQ
potential mishandling.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi Tim, do you mean improper handling by our consumer code or improper
handling by ActiveMQ when selectors don't match?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hello everyone
We are running AMQ 5.14 embedded mode under JBoss 7 with Java 7, 100%
persistent messaging supported by JournalledJDCBPersistence to an Oracle 12
DB. Durable topic subscription processing is our focus.
Our activmq-broker.xml looks like this:
http://www.springframework.org/schema
11 matches
Mail list logo
