h tar, not Red Hat.
When I took the zip file for windows, I could compile it. My question is
whether there are any implications for using this zip for Windows on Linux?
Thanks
gali_ka wrote:
>
> I am unable to build active-mq cpp on linux.
> 1. I installed cpp-unit
> 2. autogen.sh f
ing to do is check to make sure they actually exist
> in the directory 'src/main/activemq/connector/openwire/commands/'.
>
> Regards
> Tim.
>
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:50 -0700, gali_ka wrote:
>> I am unable to build active-mq cpp on linux.
>> 1. I insta
I am unable to build active-mq cpp on linux.
1. I installed cpp-unit
2. autogen.sh failed complaining about AM_PATH_CPPUNIT. I created symlinks
for *.m4 files in my aclocal dir
3. i ran configure
4. ran make
make failed with
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -ansi -pedantic -W -Wall -fPIC
-fs
'm using activemq in my c++ application. In the examples published on the
active-mq site, I saw that connection->start() is called immediately after
creating connection. Is it necessary to call Connection::start() before
creating session, setting exception listener, creating consumer and
producer?
we have an c++ application using activemq.
As we understand, in case of broken connection we can get a signal about it
from two places:
1. we try to send and get an exception in our thread
try
{
producer.send(..);
}
catch(CMSException&){..}
2. onException() - that will be proceeded from anothe
han wrote:
>
> Actually the CMSCorrelationID is used for this purpose. Just have the
> guy on the other end set that before he sends back the response.
>
> Regards,
> Nate
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: gali_ka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent:
Hi,
i'm using activemq in my c++ application. I send asynchronously a message to
a consumer. Per each message sent, i store some info which will be treated
accordingly to result i get. So i get a message id after calling
producer.send (getCMSMessageID) and use this id to store the info. What is
t
Hi,
i'm using activemq in my c++ application. I have one connection and one
session for this connection. I see that the session (SessionExecutor) starts
a new thread. I set my class that starts the connection and the session to
be the exceptionListener. Does that mean that the onException will be
