Thanks a lot !
Anyone who if this is different in version 5.3 ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Daniel
H. Willstrand wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:08 PM, forda
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> When activemq creates the tables and such the same tablespace
Hi !
When activemq creates the tables and such the same tablespace is used for
the data even for
indexes. It is possible to specify a different tablespace for indexes? If
yes howto ? Which is
the reccomended way ? Is it is possible to decide the postfix for that
tablespace ?
Thanks in Advance.
C
Hi !
Our environment is configured with hardwareloadbalancer in front using the
Round-Robin loadbalancing
Policy. I seems if one the brokers is shutdown/goes down, a few messages
was lost in between connecting to the other Broker. The Queues are
persistent. Jms Session is transacted. Any idea wh
Hi again !
I found out away to do, what you suggested.
And it works. Instead of using con.isClosed(),
the getBrokerInfo() returns null if no connection
is active/established.
Thanks,
Daniel
forda wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks but how do i get the active connection from the pool.
>
the pool is ok.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Daniel
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:17 AM, forda wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> I found out a solution, checking if a PID file exist or not on the local
>> broker on the
>> server where the service i
rds,
Daniel
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:30 AM, forda wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> We are using the failover transport, specifying serveral brokers with
>> more
>> than one parameter
>> per each url does'nt work, throws a Property
Hi !
We are using the failover transport, specifying serveral brokers with more
than one parameter
per each url does'nt work, throws a PropertyIndex exception or something
similiar. I read about
this in the forum, but nowone seems to have an answer on that issue. Does'nt
matter if i use the
TCPTr
It worked perfectly.
/Daniel
forda wrote:
>
> Thank you, i will try that instead.
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>>
>> Fir the shared master/slave setup you don't need to define any network
>> connectors, but just simply point both br
Hi !
Hi we found out a solution specifying the host in the wrappper.conf
file.
/Daniel
forda wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> From a UnitTest accessing a Broker via Spring and a BrokerviewBean in
> order to manage
> the setup and cleanup functions. For that BrokerviewBean is used.
Hi !
I found out a solution, checking if a PID file exist or not on the local
broker on the
server where the service is deployed. Seems to be the easiest way to
accomplish this.
Regards,
Daniel
forda wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> Which is the easiest way to check if the connection to
Hi !
Which is the easiest way to check if the connection to a broker is active.
Using:
In a monitor servlet code the the jmstemplate sends a m
om/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:20 AM, forda
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I forgot to provide the logs.
>>
>
Daniel
forda wrote:
>
> Hello !
>
> Currently i am working for a customer to setup a ActiveMQ production alike
> environment,
> designed for failover on the client or the server. Our first approach is
> to use failover on
> the client and using a shared database building
Hello !
Currently i am working for a customer to setup a ActiveMQ production alike
environment,
designed for failover on the client or the server. Our first approach is to
use failover on
the client and using a shared database building a Master/Slave scenario
having a database
cluster. I works in
r. Rob has recently blogged about this
> feature:
> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/2009/10/query-statistics-for-apache-activemq.html
>
>
> 2009/10/16 forda
>
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> From a UnitTest accessing a Broker via Spring and a BrokerviewBean in
>> order
>> t
pi, which will
> automatically deal with failover. Rob has recently blogged about this
> feature:
> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/2009/10/query-statistics-for-apache-activemq.html
>
>
> 2009/10/16 forda
>
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> From a UnitTest accessing a Bro
gt; Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:05 PM, forda
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> From a UnitTest accessing a Broker via Spring and a BrokerviewBean in
>> order
>> to manage
>> the setup and cleanup functio
Hi !
Working for a customer using ActiveMQ, soon we are going in to production.
I am responsible to come up with a smart solution, fullfilling the
requirment
of having reliable configuration. We are using Oracle as the
persistence/Message
store.
It's a Oracle cluster. What is the best way to ac
Hi !
>From a UnitTest accessing a Broker via Spring and a BrokerviewBean in order
to manage
the setup and cleanup functions. For that BrokerviewBean is used. It works
fine at localhost
as well as connecting a remote Broker in a windows network, but while trying
to the same thing
in Linux network
19 matches
Mail list logo