Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-06 Thread edbras
> if you're using a pool, usually the pool is in charge of shutting down connections. I am using the Spring pool: org.springframework.jms.connection.CachingConnectionFactory And yes, I think the order is incorrect, what I can tell from the logging. >From the logging: - 13:43:53.103 [Thread-7

Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-05 Thread edbras
> it's possible the broker gets shut down first before all the client connections are properly shut down? How can I determine this? What triggers the shutdown of a client connection? (how/where?) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/When-will-activemq-core-5-9

Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-05 Thread edbras
It's hard to create an isolated test app, found it hard where to start (a client app that is bit large). But I did some more digging and found the following: In the unit tests I create a global Spring ApplicationContext and call the method ctx.registerShutdownHook() on the context such that all be

Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-05 Thread edbras
It's working now, but only get this strange shutdown exception at the end when running it embedded in spring during unit tests. See error below. I noticed more people experience this same error, but I can't find a good way to solve it. Any idea? Strangely I didn't have this with version 5.7.0. Any

Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-05 Thread edbras
> yah, if using the spring config, you may want activemq-spring also Yes of course, sounds kind of logic ;).. And yes, that did the trick. I now have: activemq-broker, activemq-client, activemq-spring, activemq-activemq-kahadb-store Which seems to work fine. -- View this message in context: ht

Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-05 Thread edbras
> I think activemq-broker and activemq-kahadb-store should be enough. If I do so, I do get the xml ns error below. If I include the activemq-all, it works, but then I get other conflicting issues like slf4j, geronimo, etc... Example usage: xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; B

Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-04 Thread edbras
> Read the release notes, for the releases, to find details Did that, and they indicate the use activemq-all, wich is too big for my embedded config (using both client and server). -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/When-will-activemq-core-5-9-be-present-in

Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-04 Thread edbras
Thanks. And what about the kahadb jar, as it also isn't updated to 5.9? Maybe the faq should be updated: LINKE . I am just not sure which jars I need. I always included the activemq-core, kahab and activeio.core (like indicated in the faq)

When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo?

2013-12-04 Thread edbras
I noticed that activemq-core 5.9 isn't present in the central repo (neither 5.8). Why? and will this change? (activemq-all 5.9 is present thought). Sorry, there might be a good reason for it, I probably missed it, neither can't I find it. - Ed -- View this message in context: http://activemq.22

Re: RedeliveryPolicy per destination?

2011-03-17 Thread edbras
Hi, Just raised a feature request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3224 - Ed -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/RedeliveryPolicy-per-destination-tp3384640p3385194.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RedeliveryPolicy per destination?

2011-03-17 Thread edbras
I noticed in ActiveMq currently it's only possible to define redeliveryPolicy on the connection Factory or Connection. Is it also possible to define the redeliveryPolicy per destination? or when will this be supported. I have different kind of queue's that come from the same Factory but like to u