Thanks. I agree. I just wanted to be sure that there is nothing like that
available with kahadb before using leveldb based replicated store.
Please let me know if there are any known caveats/limitations/issues with
using leveldb based store instead of kahadb. For e.g. One thing I am aware
of is t
Thanks for these prompt replies. Very helpful!
>> What do you mean? A network storage is already supposed to do that.
>> Nothing
>> provides "real time" anyway, not even ZooKeeper, you always need to wait
>> for a minimum time to detect that your master got faulty, and switch to
>> another serv
Hi,
I am currently running ActiveMQ brokers using the Shared kahadb based
Master/Slave topology. This setup currently uses NFS/Filer for kahadb state
and the primary and failover brokers contend for lock on shared state such
that only one broker is active at a time. However, I now want to avoid us
Hi ActiveMQ developer team,
Could you please provide a rough timeline/estimate on when ActiveMQ-5.9 and
ActiveMQ-5.10 will be released? It will help me plan my work accordingly.
Also, any ETA on ActiveMQ-6.0 will also be greatly helpful.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://activem
