James.Strachan wrote:
>
> Note that to re-enable the consumer each time you need to start the
> consumer on startup of the broker or add the
> Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.FOO queue to the startup destinations.
>
James -- since Virtual Topics were designed to get around durable
subscription limitat
e subscriptions, and it's not how it should work in
virtual topics.
Does anyone have a test that counters this?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 24/09/2007, dantelope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> The following test produces unexpected results:
>>
>> 1)
Hi, James - thanks for the quick reply.
I had not started it in persistent mode and I was not statically defining
the consumer queue. However, upon doing that the same results apply.
I *should* be able to start this broker, send messages to the topic, bring
down the broker, bring up the broker,
The following test produces unexpected results:
1) Start a broker with a statically defined destination topic called
VirtualTopic.FOO
2) Start a consumer listening to Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.FOO
3) Start a sender and send N messages to VirtualTopic.FOO
4) Consumer correctly receives N messages.
5
Ahh...
I just may have had a Eureka moment, but let me verify this with the
community here.
1) I am supposed to be PRODUCING on activemq:topic:VirtualTopic.test
2) I am supposed to be CONSUMING on
activemq:queue:Consumer.CamelTest.VirtualTopic.test
i.e., produce on a TOPIC, consume on a QUEUE.
I've been trying to get Virtual Topics to work in AMQ 4.1.1 and failing
miserably :super:
What I *want* to do is:
1) Set up a virtual topic (is this done in configuration? dynamically? i'd
prefer configuration, but...)
2) Post a message to the virtual topic (see below)
3) Receive that message fr
