gt; nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-tp4727071.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Kind regards,
Brett Delle Grazie
citly add the backup connectors to the connectors list and
also the static connectors list in the cluster configuration?
Is the "exclusions" list correct?
Thanks,
Brett
On 25 May 2017 at 14:35, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> It's really hard for us to test every single combinations o
Does anyone have any insight into my questions below please?
Thanks.
Brett
On 24 May 2017 at 09:59, Brett Delle Grazie
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build a 2 cluster with colocated backups and replication
> (not shared store). In my particular case I need to use static def
g the right
things here? I've followed the 'scale-down' example but I'm not sure this
is right in this case and the documentation around excludes is somewhat
confusing.
If there's any other advice / recommendations people have regarding a setup
like this, please feel free.
Tha
Gary, thanks for the answer. I'll see what I can figure out.
Brett
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Gary Tully wrote:
> There is no easy answer, the a new bridge is created after each
> failure, so there is no resume, just a new start.
>
> The corresponding mbeans come and
is that there in fact seems no way to get ahold of the
bridge (or bridges) inside of the DiscoveryNetworkConnector itself.
Therefore,
there is no way to actually set a listener.
Is it possible to monitor the comings and goings of a bridge? If so, how?
Thanks,
Brett
m ActiveMQTopic. Unfortunately the
JavaDoc for this method just says:
"the bridgeTempDestinations to set"
Which isn't very informative. Can someone tell me what this does?
Does it imply that temporary destinations are not "bridged" to other
brokers if this is set to 'false', and are "bridged" if set to true?
Brett
l information if transmitting
files
over ActiveMQ"
I agree, it is useful. And it seems the "official" way to send the name of
the
"attachment" so I would prefer to use it.
Is this a known issue? Or am I doing something incorrectly?
Brett
Pauli,
Just so you know, I'm another user very interested in the outcome of this
because we just started building a solution based on a network of brokers.
I appreciate your debugging efforts.
Brett
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Pauli Kaila wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for y
ore the broker was stopped, I would not
expect any callbacks to the consumer.
Via breakpoints I have verified that the order of things shutting down are
correct (and as listed above).
Is there something that I'm missing?
Thanks in advance,
Brett
I am working on a project where I will probably have two to three ActiveMQ
brokers setup in a chain where I will need to be publishing files that will
probably tens of megabytes in size. I have already been able to setup some
topic forwarding across the brokers and that all seems fine. The problem
a.broker.region.Queue for one of those cases, again, wasn't sure if I
was expecting something that I shouldn't or if this was an issue.
I'm currently using 5.2.0, I have 5.3.0, however from the digging I've done,
I believe 5.3.0 behaves the same way, however I haven't
12 matches
Mail list logo
