Re: AMQ Artemis High Availability - Use shared store only for lock

2019-10-15 Thread blue_nekton
Hi Justin, Yes.I agree that if we have shared store, we don't need to replication. But it would good option to have jdbc (shared store) for lock only to avid the split-brain issue as configuring 3 pair is not suitable for small environment and 3 pairs add lot of complexity. Thanks for the detail

AMQ Artemis High Availability - Use shared store only for lock

2019-10-14 Thread blue_nekton
Hi, For small environment to use High availability, it is often difficult to setup 3-pair cluster to avoid split-brain. It would be great if artemis master and slave use data replication and use shared store only for lock and providing HA . So anytime, master/slave verifies and gets lock before t

Artemis JDBC storage for HA- possible Split-brain?

2019-06-28 Thread blue_nekton
Hi All, We are noticing split-brain issues (Network isolation) in Single pair HA Replication. Due to limitations, we will not be able to use multiple pairs. So I am exploring the JDBC storage option for the Artemis High availability (HA) with a single pair of master and slave. Have anyone used

Re: SMB 3.0 as shared filesystem for kahaDB in Master/Slave

2019-06-27 Thread blue_nekton
Hi Cezkuj, Were you able to achieve? I am exploring ActiveMq Artemis Master and Slave configuration on Azure Files (SMB3.0) and would like to know whether you were be able to complete. Thanks -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html