Thanks for you advice for tuning JDBC and configuration of network connector,
and we'll definitely try that. But it looks like the network connector is
closed from the source side due to local JDBC exception(the source side
means the source ActiveMQ server of forwarded message via network
connector
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your advice, I've already filed a jira ticket for it. It is
AMQ-6200
Add a retry mechanism would be a decent solution to my problem, and I agree
with you that just ignoring the exception is not a good one. Please add this
feature to future ActiveMQ release. We can disable pooling
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your useful tips. I agree that there may be some configuration
problem in JDBS store, but I don't think the network connector should just
be stopped and never be restarted again without restarting ActiveMQ service
due to exeption in JDBC store. I don't think it is an acceptable b
Hi Tim,
Really appreciated for your reply, here is the datasource configuration,
just the same as the one shown in ActiveMQ webpage.
What's the performance impact if I set poolPreparedStatements to false?
Best Regards
--
View this message
Hi Tim,
Really appreciated for your reply, here is the datasource configuration,
just the same as the one shown in ActiveMQ webpage.
What's the performance impact if I set poolPreparedStatements to false?
Best Regards
--
View this message in c
*Configuration for network connector:
*
*log:
*2016-03-03 14:41:13,070 | WARN | JDBC Failure: Borrow prepareStatement from
pool failed | org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.JDBCPersistenceAdapter |
ActiveMQ Transport: tcp://10.102.44.181:61616@38805
org.apache.commons.dbcp.SQLNestedException: Borro
I used Active Directory for activemq authentication, and I noticed that every
time a new jms connection is established between client and activemq server,
the activemq server will create a ldap connection between Active Directory
even the refresh is disabled, can anyone tell me the reason.
It's so
the LDAP server I used is Active Directory. when I try to set
refreshInterval=-1 for cachedLDAPAuthorizationMap, I got the following
errors:
ERROR | Caught unexpected exception.
javax.naming.OperationNotSupportedException: [LDAP: error code 12 -
0057: LdapErr: DSID-0C090796, comment: Error proc
No update until now, is there any plan to fix it?
Please NOTE it is a serious security issue if we want to make it on
production environment
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-any-way-to-encrypt-connectionPassword-in-LDAPLoginModule-tp4697979p470155
I just created a jira ticket AMQ-5860. Please take a look at it
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-any-way-to-encrypt-connectionPassword-in-LDAPLoginModule-tp4697979p4698120.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for your help! I'll fire a ticket for it
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-any-way-to-encrypt-connectionPassword-in-LDAPLoginModule-tp4697979p4697983.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks a lot for your reply. I've tried the cached ldap authorization map.
But I still need to set connectionPassoword in cleartext in login.config
file to make it work. I really want to know if it is possible to encrypt
password in login.config file.
--
View this message in context:
http://act
Hi all,
I am using ldap service to do authentication and authorization, and I need
to set connectionPassword for LDAPLoginModule in login.config file. Is there
any way to encrypt this password.
Any response is highly appreciated.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324
Not work on replicated leveldb store. Sorry for confusion. Anyone knows why?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/logSize-of-LevelDB-Store-not-work-tp4697160p4697161.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I set the logSize to 2GB, but after I start activemq instance, I found the
size of log is also 100 MB. Tried on both 5.10.2 and 5.11.1. Anyone knows is
it a bug or I missed something?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/logSize-of-LevelDB-Store-not-work-tp4697
Hi all
I am new to activemq, and I encounter an issue when using activemq. It is
because we have our own version of javax.jms and there is another one in
activemq-all.jar, which leads to conflict.
Could any one tell me how to exclude the javax from activemq-all? I am using
maven.
--
View this m
16 matches
Mail list logo