Re: Apache Artemis - Stress-test time

2017-04-14 Thread alessandro.zann...@bticino.it
clebertsuconic wrote > I am very confused here... > We have a small issue on quering the queues... but from what I saw the > CPU issue was on your usage of whatever logger framework you were > using. I'm not sure what we can do there. Hi, we use a custom security plugin that loads security roles (

Re: Apache Artemis - Stress-test time

2017-04-13 Thread alessandro.zann...@bticino.it
@Mtaylor @clebert Any news for us ? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Artemis-Stress-test-time-tp4723999p4724924.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Apache Artemis - Stress-test time

2017-04-11 Thread alessandro.zann...@bticino.it
so if there aren't retained messages ... Can you confirm this "strange" behaviour of Artemis ? Alessandro ZANNINI Project Leader Portale My Home e Sviluppo Applicazioni WEB Tel: +(39)0332272966 Ext 9966 Indirizzo: V.le Borri 231 Varese 21100 IT email: alessandro.zann..

Re: Apache Artemis - Stress-test time

2017-04-10 Thread alessandro.zann...@bticino.it
Here attached the output of "jstack -F" command. jstack.zip -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Artemis-Stress-test-time-tp4723999p4724787.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list

Re: Apache Artemis - Stress-test time

2017-04-10 Thread alessandro.zann...@bticino.it
Hello, I'm a colleague of Francesco. We just made another test , just connecting, without subscribing, in order to check if the problem is the authorization procedure... and we discovered that this step doesn't occupy a lot of cpu (never reached 5% of usage). So we can say that the "heavy" step i