s always < 2.
> Can you do an svn up to validate.
>
> thanks for the heads up on your fix. Think it is best not to limit the
> pending wakeups to max page size as it may result in a hung destination.
>
> 2009/11/13 afei
>
>>
>> the test scene: after accumulate a
> Can you do an svn up to validate.
>
> thanks for the heads up on your fix. Think it is best not to limit the
> pending wakeups to max page size as it may result in a hung destination.
>
> 2009/11/13 afei
>
>>
>> the test scene: after accumulate a large of message
gt; destination keeps responding.
>
> 2009/11/12 afei
>
>>
>> when consuming a large of messages,the method:asyncWakeup() is invoked
>> crazily,so the executor
>> has a great deal of runnable that callback Queue.iterate(), but
>> Queue.iterate() is much slo
t; resolving https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2481
>
> 2009/11/10 afei :
>>
>> in org.apache.activemq.broker.region ,why so many invoke asyncWakeup(),
>> what is the method:iterate() doing?
>>
>>
>> afei wrote:
>>>
>>> in ad
pache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2481
>
> 2009/11/10 afei :
>>
>> in org.apache.activemq.broker.region ,why so many invoke asyncWakeup(),
>> what is the method:iterate() doing?
>>
>>
>> afei wrote:
>>>
>>> in addition,another problem of OOM.
>
pache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2481
>
> 2009/11/10 afei :
>>
>> in org.apache.activemq.broker.region ,why so many invoke asyncWakeup(),
>> what is the method:iterate() doing?
>>
>>
>> afei wrote:
>>>
>>> in addition,another problem of OOM.
>
in org.apache.activemq.broker.region ,why so many invoke asyncWakeup(),
what is the method:iterate() doing?
afei wrote:
>
> in addition,another problem of OOM.
>
>
>
> Gary Tully wrote:
>>
>> fyi: you can disable periodic message expiry processing using a
&g
in addition,another problem of OOM.
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> fyi: you can disable periodic message expiry processing using a
> destination policy entry that sets expireMessagesPeriod = 0
>
> 2009/11/9 afei :
>>
>>
>> when a large of messages in queue,and no
i test r831258,the problem still exist
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> fyi: you can disable periodic message expiry processing using a
> destination policy entry that sets expireMessagesPeriod = 0
>
> 2009/11/9 afei :
>>
>>
>> when a large of messages in queue,and no
;> So we turned off stomp+nio and went back to plain old stomp and so far
>> it's
>> working fine. New(IO) isn't always better, I guess :-)
>>
>> Seems like maybe it's this issue ->
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2440
>>
>
i have same problem
http://www.nabble.com/file/p26093204/aa.jpg aa.jpg
themitchy wrote:
>
> This is what we've done to tune so far:
>
> - UseDedicatedTaskRunner=false
> - flow control is off
> - stomp transport uses transport.closeAsync=false
>
> I agree that it is because
11 matches
Mail list logo