Awesome! Thanks a lot. I'll give this a try.
Thanks!
-will
On 16.04.2014, at 21:48, kthotakura [via ActiveMQ]
wrote:
> Hi
> I was trying the same setup (1 tomcat 2 web apps) with embedded ActiveMQ. I
> got it working. Checkout my notes - kthotakura.blogspot.com
>
>
)
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.doAsyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1265)
... 7 more
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Will
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-5-0-broker-crashing-tp3667090p3667090.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
essages on a topic for each consumer. The queue
> limits are only set to prevent the broker from running out of memory if a
> particular consumer starts blocking. We are hoping that if a consumer
> dies, the queue limits will at least keep any message queues for the dead
> consumer from
d several other
people report the same problem with different clients leading me to believe
that there must be something odd under the hood.
Rick Blair wrote:
>
> Hi Will,
>
> We use an embedded broker Here is the url.
>
> tcp://{0}:{1}?jms.useAsyncSend=false&jm
trick.
Regards,
Will
Rick Blair wrote:
>
> Hi Kirby,
>
> We have seen exactly the same behaviour. As a work around we set
> optimizeAcknowdlege to false. I did not run down the root cause, however.
>
> --
> Cheers!
>
> Rick Blair
>
>
>> From: &q
usage is predicatable. As soon as the consumer dies, it seems
that everything destined to that consumer is left hanging.
-Will
Frugia, Kirby A wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if it would be the prefetch size. The memory usage rightly
> goes up when the consumer stops ack'ing message
t;
> Yes, this is exactly what we are seeing. Any ideas?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Will van der Leij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 11:42 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Broker not releasing memory
>
>
>
there soething
wrnog with the setup.
Many thanks
Will van der Leij
Frugia, Kirby A wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry I dual-posted in the dev list. I think I sent to the wrong one...
>
> We are seeing an issue with our broker not releasing memory on topics.
>
> S
hi,
i found a high available pure Master/Slaver cluster in the user guide,i have
some confuse:
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20713698/ha.jpeg
1/ is it one instance of activemq or two in one machine?
2/how can i configure it ?
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-ca
I am testing ActiveMQ 5.2,when i post 1M messages and user "activemq-admin
stop" to shutdown the broker and restart it. I found it cost about 1 hours.
it is too slow!
my config file:
i already close log recovery,so it is no matter.
and i d
de a brief description?
Thanks again.
- Will
semog wrote:
>
> Hi Will,
>
> It wasn't intentionally removed, it just hasn't been filled in yet. I
> have some semi-official binaries built, but have not created a single
> package of them yet. I am working on the scr
I am looking to download the latest NMS build from:
http://activemq.apache.org/nms/download.html
However, there are no contents at this link.
Was this intentionally removed?
Thanks for your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/NMS-Download--tp20508850p20508850.html
Sen
when i user QueueSender.send(object) it throw a NoSuchMethod exception. in
it's source code,like this:
public abstract class ActiveMQMessageProducerSupport ... {
public void send(Message message, int deliveryMode, int priority, long
timeToLive) throws JMSException {
this.send(this.getDest
13 matches
Mail list logo
