ere's definitely
a problem with AMQ that he is still fixing.
Thanks again.
phil.
On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
er - kinda fixed - there's another leak just need to plug ...
On Oct 2, 2007, at 1:23 PM, WHIRLYCOTT wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Rob Davies wrot
On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
I'm going to see if I can reproduce on OS/X
Any luck?
phil.
--
Whirlycott
Philip Jacob
[EMAIL PROT
urable-subscribers-tf4487985s2354.html#a12983727
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Whirlycott
Philip Jacob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/
vior
ought to be correct and that this should still function, albeit
slowly. Currently, it does not appear to be so.
phil.
--
Whirlycott
Philip Jacob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
achines.
I'm running on OS/X and Linux.
phil.
--
Whirlycott
Philip Jacob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/
try {
conn.close();
} catch (JMSException e) {
log.warn(e.getMessage(), e);
}
g problem?
phil.
PS Sidenote: "AcitveMQ" is misspelled in the source code.
--
Whirlycott
Philip Jacob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/
