I'm not the Active MQ Team, but the homepage http://activemq.apache.org/
states it is "released under the Apache 2.0 License"
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
which means you can pretty much do what you want with the software without
paying anyone.
See also LICENSE.txt in the root
I believe the max number of MDB instances that will be started is a
container-specific setting, for example with JBoss its going to be in the
ejb jar META-INF/jboss.xml file.
Tim
avin98 wrote:
>
> My MDB is in a long lived conversation state, and I have Authentication
> Requests arriving on
If your hunch is correct (about Spring initializing a new context for each
MDB instance) you can try a SingletonBeanFactoryLocator :
http://www.springframework.org/docs/api/org/springframework/beans/factory/access/SingletonBeanFactoryLocator.html
In setMessageDrivenContext, do something like this
I created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1224
No patch this time :(
Tim
Tim Morrow 2 wrote:
>
> If the maven plugin fails to start the broker for whatever reason (e.g.
> there is already a process listening on the broker port) the error is
> logged b
If the maven plugin fails to start the broker for whatever reason (e.g. there
is already a process listening on the broker port) the error is logged but
the maven build proceeds. I would have expected the maven build to error
out.
It would appear that this is because the class that the plugin in
And here is the issue: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1223
with patch attached.
Tim Morrow 2 wrote:
>
> Right now when I start the broker via the Maven plugin, it creates the
> "activemq-data" directory in the directory from which I'm executing
>
Sorry, its been a while since I've had to write a client by hand, but do you
need to call
amqConnection.start()
to begin receiving messages?
Tim
astepanenko wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'm new to ActiveMQ and have run into a problem when EnqueueCount and
> DispatchCount for my queue in JConso
Done.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1222
BTW, There didn't seem to be a component for the Maven plugin.
Tim
James.Strachan wrote:
>
>> Would adding a "fork" option to the plugin make sense?
>
> Definitely! We could spin up ActiveMQ in a background thread, let
> maven continue
hen set to true spawns AMQ in a
thread.
Now my container tests are self-contained and run to completion.
Would adding a "fork" option to the plugin make sense?
Thanks,
Tim
Tim Morrow 2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of automating my container tests, part of which
&
Hi,
I'm in the process of automating my container tests, part of which includes
spinning up an ActiveMQ instance for the duration of running the tests.
I found the maven plugin and it works great for starting ActiveMQ, the
problem being that it blocks the Maven build process. I'd like to be abl
10 matches
Mail list logo