On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Stanislaw Kogut
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Bruce Snyder >wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Stanislaw Kogut
> >> wrote:
> >
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Stanislaw Kogut
> wrote:
> > I already tried every topic here, with no significant effect.
> > I'm already using KahaDB for peristence (even placing it's data to
> tmpfs).
>
eb: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/dejanb
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Stanislaw Kogut
> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm currently e
out big latency impact to increase it's throughput?
--
Regards,
Stanislaw Kogut
Sistyma LLC
ion confirms "DROP PRIMARY KEY" is wrong statement. It
has 'ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT "name"' statement instead.
Looks like after that whole transaction is rolled back, so tables are not
created at all. Is there any success in using PostgreSQL for ActiveMQ?
--
Regards,
Stanislaw Kogut
Sistyma LLC