Was this all running on a single 6-cpu host?
I found your initial results surprising given that I have done similar
testing just a few weeks ago that struggled to make a third of your
throughput, but my tests involved two 2-cpu hosts, so this likely accounts
for the difference.
Also to clarify, w
with prefetchSize set to 1000. No change in throughput.
Thanks,
Sean
On Feb 11, 2008 1:15 PM, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> Curious to know the average message size used and whether you used the
> default broker configuration?
>
> Thanks,
> Jo
I guess my first message was too long, but that's alright, I ended up
getting the answers I needed. I figured I should let you guys in on the
results of my testing.
The summary of my initial write up is that my main requirement is message
throughput per host, so that is what my testing has been f
le.com/ActiveMQ-thoughts-to14262131s2354.html). Were the
problems he found confined to c++ working with c#, or may there also be
problems using c++ with Java?
Thanks in advance,
Sean Bastille
