Hi,
I'm using ActiveMQ version 5.10.1 and have a requirement to regularly poll
my ActiveMQ installation and identify when a message has been sitting on a
specified queue for a specified period of time.
What are my programmatic options for achieving this?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
--
V
Thanks for this.
I tried this with a test server which was showing 25% store used. I deleted
each of the 140 or so DLQ entries manually (the "Purge" option for th ewhole
queue didn't seem to do anything) and the store went down to 21%.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n
Thanks for your thoughts.
The web console shows that the messages are being dequeued at the same rate
as they are being queued so I was presuming that they were being deleted
successfully.
I will investigate how to use JMX to view the broker and report back.
There are a few messages in the DLQ b
Hello,
I'm using ActiveMQ version 5.10.1.
Since we started using ActiveMQ a few weeks ago, the store percentage for
the broker has been steadily increasing - from 10% at the start of the month
to 29% currently.
In that period, we have processed (sent to queue and subsequently removed)
approximat
Tim Bain wrote
> My jetty.xml file has only your second bean, not the first one (and our
> users list in jetty-realm.properties includes only admin users), and
> authentication works, so commenting out your entire securityConstraint
> bean
> seems like an easy way to simplify your config and see if
Tim Bain wrote
> Those are IDs (and I'm positive they have to be unique); I was referring
> to
>
> in each bean. Maybe Spring doesn't
> mind that, I don't remember (I mainly use annotations these days), but it
> seemed like an easy thing for you to check.
>
> More generally, I'd simplify your c
Tim Bain wrote
> I thought Spring didn't allow multiple beans with the same name... Try
> commenting out the admin one, and if that works then try changing the
> admin
> one's name.
Don't the beans already have different names? "securityConstraint" and
"adminSecurityConstraint".
Mark
--
View
> Did you enable authentication in jetty.xml as described in
> http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html?
I believe so: I have the following entries in the jetty.xml file:
Mark
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/SecurityException-Us
Hello,
I'm trying to set up ActiveMQ version 5.10.1 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Server release 7.1 with a new user which can use the web console. What I
have done:
1) Created following entry in users.properties: myUser=myPwd
2) Added the user to the 'publishers' and 'consumers' groups in
groups.p
ActiveMQ version 5.10.1
With reference to the security documentation at
http://activemq.apache.org/security.html, I'm trying to add a new user to my
ActiveMQ configuration. This user should only be able to see a subset of the
available queues on the broker.
I have done the following:
1) Added an
To add users who are able to access the web console, you have to update the
conf/jetty-realm.properties file.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Adding-users-and-console-access-tp4694081p4694085.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabbl
11 matches
Mail list logo