Maven plugin dependency problem in multi-module build

We're using the ActiveMQ maven plugin to run a broker in the pre-integration-test phase of one module in a multi-module project. It starts up fine when you build just that module, but if you go up to the parent project and try to do a build of all modules, ActiveMQ fails to start with a ClassNotFo

Re: Maven + ActiveMQ + my own code

Ryan Stewart wrote: > > My question remains: can the Maven plugin run ActiveMQ and include the > Maven classpath so it finds my classes? > The more I think about it, the more I think this is more of a Maven question than an ActiveMQ question because I think it comes down to the

Re: Maven + ActiveMQ + my own code

Mick Knutson-3 wrote: > > > class="org.apache.activemq.camel.component.ActiveMQComponent"> > > > > Configures a camel component named "jms" to connect to a broker at the default port on localhost. Mick Knutson-3 wrote: > > class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"> >

Re: Maven + ActiveMQ + my own code

Mick Knutson-3 wrote: > > If you use Spring, you can have Spring start an embedded broker for you > in > a unit test like: > > http://www.baselogic.com/blog/java/testing-activemq-virtualtopics-using-camel-and-junit > I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. I don't see anywhere in that pos

Re: Maven + ActiveMQ + my own code

Gary Tully wrote: > > You may need to add your project to the dependencies of the > maven-activemq-plugin definition, like jetty, in the example @ > see: http://activemq.apache.org/maven2-activemq-broker-plugin.html > The problem is that my project is the one where I have the activemq plugin d

Maven + ActiveMQ + my own code

I'm trying to get ActiveMQ started with the Maven plugin. I've added some extra beans to the activemq.xml that depend on classes that are part of the project where the plugin is defined. When I start the broker with 'mvn activemq:run', it complains that it can't find the classes. How do I get the

Re: BrokerService.isSlave() for pure master/slave only?

That may work. I went and found the openwire connector and checked its status since slave brokers don't start their connectors. This required a bit of reflection, but it's very fast and only a temporary solution. The problem still remains, though, that isSlave() seems to make bad assumptions, and

BrokerService.isSlave() for pure master/slave only?

I'm trying to find a way to tell whether a broker is master or not on version 5.1. I know that 5.2 has the advisory topic for when a broker becomes master, but I can't use that just now. I do have access to the BrokerService, though, which has the isSlave() method; however I'm using JDBC master/sl

Re: Only memory transaction store with JDBC persistence adapter??

Ryan Stewart wrote: > > [...] > > In this class, preparedTransactions is a LinkedHashMap. Perhaps someone > has made the mistaken assumption that the TransactionId object contains > all the necessary data for recovering a transaction? All of the > TransactionStore impleme

Re: Only memory transaction store with JDBC persistence adapter??

rajdavies wrote: > > > On 29 Jul 2008, at 05:41, bwtaylor wrote: > >> >> I'm kind of baffled by this, as I thought you had to flush the >> prepare out to >> a durable media, too. This is in fact, what >> http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-transactions-work.html claims >> happens. I >> don't

Re: Only memory transaction store with JDBC persistence adapter??

bwtaylor wrote: > > [...] > The underlying jdbc connection commits when told to do so from the > TransactionContext object, which commits when JDBCPersistenceAdapter's > commitTransaction method is called. I don't quite see how this is > connected to the XATransaction's calling of commit(). >

Only memory transaction store with JDBC persistence adapter??

I'm working on setting up ActiveMQ in a JDBC master/slave topology. It will also need to participate in XA transactions. When tracing through the code, I was surprised to see this in the JDBCPersistenceAdapter: private MemoryTransactionStore transactionStore; So when using pure JDBC for mess

Re: VM transport not using pass-by-reference

Ryan Stewart wrote: > > I'm trying to use an embedded ActiveMQ instance for some lightweight > message handling... > *bump* again. Is there no answer to this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/VM-transport-not-using-pass-by-reference-tp17442075s2354p1

Re: VM transport not using pass-by-reference

ttmdev wrote: > > FYI - copyMessageOnSend is being used within the ActiveMQSession.send() > method. > > ... > if (connection.isCopyMessageOnSend()) { >msg = (ActiveMQMessage)msg.copy(); > } > ... > > Joe > Cool. Thanks for pointing that out. -- View this message in context: http://www

Re: VM transport not using pass-by-reference

Hi Rob. I call connection.setCopyMessageOnSend(false) on the producer and consumer connection objects, and yes, the producer and consumers all use the vm transport. See my second post in this thread for sample code demonstrating the problem. (Actually, I just noticed that in that code I have "cop

Re: VM transport not using pass-by-reference

Ryan Stewart wrote: > > I'm trying to use an embedded ActiveMQ instance for some lightweight > message handling... > *bump* Anyone? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/VM-transport-not-using-pass-by-reference-tp17442075s2354p17520875.html Sent from th

Re: VM transport not using pass-by-reference

Ryan Stewart wrote: > > I'm trying to use an embedded ActiveMQ instance for some lightweight > message handling... > Here is a simple test case that exhibits the problem. Unfortunately you'll need some sort of profiler to see the actual problem. When I run

VM transport not using pass-by-reference

I'm trying to use an embedded ActiveMQ instance for some lightweight message handling. According to the http://activemq.apache.org/vm-transport-reference.html VM Transport Reference and http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-use-the-vm-transport.html this FAQ , the VM transport should pass mes