Thanks to all who have replied. Appreciated.
It kinda confirmed my suspicion about current situation.
Anyways: JMS has been good for us. It has played its part in being a (rather
simple) vendor agnostic facade to various MOMs.
I think we'll skip the ActiveMQ case for now.
Peter
Hi there
We've developed a "thingy" that integrates with various messaging
architectures. So far - at the sites where we have deployed - we've had IBM MQ,
Tibco Message Service and even a Wildlfy installation (HornetQ) at the other
end. We've developed in Java and used JMS so we use exactly the
