Hi,
Can someone grant me access to the ActiveMQ Slack channel?
Thanks,
Paul
What OS are you using?
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 3:18 PM John Lilley
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> We were recently seeing some broker OOM errors, probably due to an
> overabundance of reply-to queues. While the broker itself seems to
> recover, our client code does not. I suspect that we need to
Hi Karl,
We use NFS 4.0 with automount on RHEL 8.3. Our NFS mount options are:
*/YOUR_MOUNT_NAME
-rw,noatime,soft,intr,noexec,nosuid,nodev,users,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,proto=tcp,nfsvers=4.0,sec=sys
1.2.3.4:/your_nfs_server_export_name_here*
Note the user id that accesses the mount has the same
>if DefaultMessageListenerContainer caches consumer, will it occurs situation
>of PooledConnectionFactory doc said?
I don't know - or more to the point it doesn't really matter as one
should never use a pooled connection factory of any kind in
conjunction with the DMLC.
The DMLC is designed such
A few questions:
- what prefetch size are your consumers using? Ideally it should be set to
1 to prevent out of order messages.
- what acknowledgement mode are you using?
- as each queue supports a max of 1024 groups, by default, are you sure
you're not blowing past this number? That might cause t
Can you please forward the details of how you're mounting the NetApp
exports? Please include all all NFS parameters.
Thanks,
Paul
On Thursday, October 6, 2016, fg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have 5 managed virtual servers with managed NetApp SAN Storage at our
> hoster. On every server an instance of A
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Quinn Stevenson <
qu...@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> MyHeaderValue
>
>
> broker://${header[JMSDestination]}
>
>
>
I have a nearly identical route r
ivemq-client jar
> doesn't have a dependency on log4j (I just double checked) and only slf4j
> so you are free to easily plug in whatever implementation of logging you
> feel like.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
>
> > Per the online docu
Per the online documentation, using activemq-all is a legitimate way to
connect to a broker. For those that were happily using it up until now,
whether others consider it 'overkill' or not, they are now screwed by this
change. Regardless, stating that one can 'fine tune' dependencies by
switching a
We're using the following with our NetApp device:
-rw,soft,intr,noexec,nosuid,nodev,users,rsize=65535,wsize=65535,proto=tcp
Whilst 'soft' is generally not recommended I've found that using 'hard'
causes the broker to lock up immediately.
The settings we have in place above were chosen by our sto
*>Using a key such as social security number for message groups is going to
be challenging simply due to the number of groups involved*
This can be overcome by using the hashing technique I described earlier
which has worked out nicely for us YMMV. In practice we've found that more
often than not t
The default limit is indeed 1024 message groups per destination.
However you increase that by adding the following configuration to your
broker's activemq.xml:
In addition to cachedMessageGroupMessageFactory (default) there's also the
Carlos,
You appear to running ActiveMQ 5.9.0 on Java 6 both of which are quite old.
Trying upgrading to the latest ActiveMQ (5.11.1) with Java 7 or 8 and, as
Tim pointed out, enable the G1GC garbage collector. Once you've done that
remove the -Xms and -Xmn flags. See if that helps.
On the off cha
What version of ActiveMQ are you using? Please send the contents of you
activemq.xml file plus details of your producer consumer and how they're
implemented.
Have you set the broker's logging to TRACE level prior to running your
experiments? If so, please attach or use pastebin.
Thanks,
Paul
On S
This
is the value that should be plugged into the rsize/wsize parameters for the
mount's definition.
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Paul
Thanks,
Paul
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Paul Gale wrote:
> In my particular case I fixed it when I realized that I had the NFS mount
> settings f
In my particular case I fixed it when I realized that I had the NFS mount
settings for the mount where the KahaDB message store was located
mis-configured. Since correcting the settings I've not had a single
problem.
Are you using NFS?
Thanks,
Paul
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:49 AM, khandelwalanuj
Assuming a consumer is acknowledging messages correctly then the only time
I have seen the dequeue count on the topics page of the web console be
non-zero is when consumers are using transactions. That's been my
experience. Not sure why though.
Regardless, what dequeue count do you expect to see w
Does anyone know of a command line utility for examining the contents
KahaDB message store?
I am experiencing occasional store corruption and need to investigate why.
Thanks,
Paul
Hi,
ActiveMQ 5.9.1
I have configured ActiveMQ to use the kaha persistence adapter with a
lease-database-locker.
However, this brings up the question as to which IO exception handler one
should configure: the DefaultIOExceptionHandler or the
JDBCIOExceptionHandler?
The JDBCIOExceptionHandler's m
Hi,
Connection pooling is generally recommended as a good thing. However, is
pooling of VM protocol (vm://) based connections
required/advised/nonsensical when communicating between Camel and a broker
in which it is embedded? Please explain.
>From what I have read the VM protocol bypasses the TCP
>Without the store, it has no way to remember anything across restarts that
is not in the configuration files.
Understood.
However, the two broker instances referenced the SAME message store (not
concurrently) which they each mounted over NFS.
Thanks,
Paul
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:55 AM, artna
Hi,
ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1.
We recently moved an existing broker to a new server. It was really a logic
move; the old broker was shutdown completely and a new one installed from
scratch on another server without copying any files from the old broker.
Essentially the new broker was the same a
Can one of the committers take a look into this ActiveMQ wiki issue below?
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Paul Gale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made some edits to the ActiveMQ wiki yesterday here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Pluggable+storage+lockers
> whe
Hi,
I made some edits to the ActiveMQ wiki yesterday here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Pluggable+storage+lockers
where I documented some of the changes 5.9.0 brought to pluggable
storage lockers.
However, my edits have not propagated over to the main site yet. Can
someone
Hi Sophia,
It's not clear to me how you intend to use the load balancer. Are you
expecting it to route traffic to the appropriate broker based on
client_id by inspecting messages or something else? Are multiple
brokers expected to be active simultaneously or master/slave?
Do you have to use a loa
STOMP, as protocol, does not support request-response (or
request/reply, whatever you want to call it) per se. However, given
that ActiveMQ has mapped the 'reply-to' header to the associated JMS
header one could infer that ActiveMQ's implementation of STOMP does
support request-response, or perhaps
The checkpoint worker (which is responsible for determining which data
log files should be removed) runs every 30 seconds.
One can learn a lot about how the data log purge is happening by
enabling its logger. See here for more details:
http://activemq.apache.org/why-do-kahadb-log-files-remain-afte
There for me as well.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Christian Posta
wrote:
> Are you sure it's gone? Seems there to me (attached)
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:31 AM, DV wrote:
>> Hey guys, the 5.9.0 release once again shuffles files around - which is
>> fine of course - but as a result our in
Have you verified via broker logging that the prefetch values you've
configured are being honored by the broker? Are consumer priorities in
use? Are your consumers instances of the same executable or are they
implemented individually?
Can you post your broker configuration: activemq.xml?
How are
the broker must implement their own solution
for doing so."
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Christian Posta
wrote:
> Done: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Stomp
>
> Should propagate to the community wiki in a few hours.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at
Hi,
I've noticed that the STOMP documentation does not mention the 'read
heart-beat grace period multiplier' configuration option that was
introduced in 5.9.0.
Any chance someone could add that?
Thanks,
Paul
What on earth is sirona/hawtio
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi guys, something to think about is sirona/hawtio I think. Any ideas?
> Goals are not exactly the same but there are some overlaps so I'd expect
> sirona amq, camel etc plugins.
> Le 29 oct. 2013 21:1
I believe that those exceptions occur when a client does not
disconnect from the broker gracefully.
Verify that your client is making the appropriate close call on the
connection. Do you have STOMP based clients that are frequently
connecting and disconnecting?
Thanks,
Paul
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013
Per Claus Ibsen's blog post:
"Over time level db is planned to be default out of the box persistent
store, instead of the current kahadb store. Though we are not there
yet, so kahadb is still the default store."
What does "we are not there yet" mean? What are the caveats regarding
LevelDB usage?
(context: for active durable topic subscribers. We're not using queues)
What is the definition of 'Dispatched Queue Size' that appears on the
web console?
What broker and/or consumer behaviors can cause it to increase?
The definitions for the others I have are:
Dispatched Counter - the total n
Simone's requirements do seem similar to what's described in the
section entitled: "Complete Example: Producer that only Produces when
there is a Consumer" (speaking of which all the code examples are
missing) here:
http://activemq.apache.org/cms/handling-advisory-messages.html
Not endorsing it,
f you can reproduce in 5.9 we have a problem that needs
> work. the key to any resolution is a reproducible test case.
>
> In any event, you should be able to recover by rebuilding the index,
> just deleting the db.data file before a restart.
>
> On 3 October 2013 17:04, Paul Ga
Anyone have any some thoughts about this?
Thanks,
Paul
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Paul Gale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1
>
> I have noticed the following exception appearing in my broker's log
> file. It appears to be related to the o
Hi,
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1.
Any troubleshooting tips folks can share as to what might be causing
this exception to show up in my broker's log? Note the miss-speeling
of 'cylce' in the exception.
I was unable to get the broker to launch after this point despite
numerous restarts. In
Hi,
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1
I have noticed the following exception appearing in my broker's log
file. It appears to be related to the once hourly check for expired
messages, as these occur at _exactly_ the same time past the hour, as
given by the expireMessagesPeriod attribute on our
Can you post your configuration (activemq.xml) and your launching script?
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:05 AM, johnbing wrote:
> Hi Ceposta,
>
> When I connect my clients using NIO transport I can see NIO worker threads
> in my logs.
> Like:
> 40 5 3 3 0
lock on a broker.
>
> On 16 September 2013 14:52, Paul Gale wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to configure a locker via XML for the redelivery plugin? I
> > know it's possible for KahaDB.
> >
> > I ask as I've just been experimenting with t
Hi,
Using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 and Fuse 5.3.1 on RHEL 6.1
I have configured some Camel routes running on ActiveMQ 5.8.0 to pull
messages from end points exposed on Fuse 5.3.1. By default the
ActiveMQConnectionFactory the Camel route uses will start its inactivity
monitor to monitor the state of the con
Hi,
Of all the defined TCP transport options:
minimumWireFormatVersion
trace
daemon
useLocalHost
socketBufferSize
keepAlive
soTimeout
connectionTimeout
wireFormat
closeAsync
soLinger
maximumConnections
diffServ
typeOfService
tcpNoDelay
- which can be used ONLY on a transport connector definition
Hi,
ActiveMQ 5.8.0
I've noticed that messages our STOMP client NACKs are sent to the DLQ
associated with the destination the message was consumed from (we have
individual dead letter strategy configured).
Is there a way to annotate a STOMP NACK message such that ActiveMQ will NOT
put the NACK'ed
, which is a category X for
> > > Apache (so not usable in an Apache project).
> > >
> > > For Karaf, I compiled the native lib for new architectures.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > &
Hi,
Is it possible to configure a locker via XML for the redelivery plugin? I
know it's possible for KahaDB.
I ask as I've just been experimenting with the redelivery plugin and
noticed that it creates it's own data store for which it maintains a file
based lock to govern access in a master-slave
B
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "Paul Gale"
> To:
> Subject: Upgrade Tanuki Service Wrapper for ActiveMQ 5.9.0?
> Date: Mon, Sep 16, 2013
to buy a license to use it. The old
> version that is shipped with ActiveMQ is still allowed to use for free
> without paying. Therefore we need to stick to that version.
>
> This has been debated before so you can possible find old mail threads
> about this.
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 a
Hi,
Not sure if this has already happened or not, as I'm not using 5.9.0 yet,
but I was wondering if the Tanuki Service Wrapper that ships with ActiveMQ
is going to be upgraded as part of the 5.9.0 release?
The version that shipped with ActiveMQ 5.8.0 is very old.
I can create a JIRA for this is
Hi,
ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1
I have a suggestion for the default configuration of the Tanuki Service
wrapper script that ships with ActiveMQ: can it include an entry that
defines a default path for the JVM's temporary directory?
Example:
wrapper.java.additional.n=-Djava.io.tmpdir=%ACTIVEMQ_BA
Hi,
Using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1
I'd like some clarification as to what is the expected behavior when one
follows these steps:
1. Using the web console create a durable topic subscriber. In my case
it was for an existing (and busy) topic (let's call it foo), the selector
was blank a
r: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
>
> > As part of the 5.9.0 release are there plans to upgrade SLF4J to 1.7.5+?
> > The risk should be low.
> >
&g
As part of the 5.9.0 release are there plans to upgrade SLF4J to 1.7.5+?
The risk should be low.
Thanks,
Paul
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes the plan is to release 5.9 soon. We're working on hardening the code
> and preparing for the release. There's no pla
scribe
to some advisory topic(s), if the client implementation supported it. I
haven't tried to do that with ours.
Thanks,
Paul
>
> On 28 August 2013 17:39, Paul Gale wrote:
> > ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1 connecting w/STOMP 1.2.
> >
> > I have noticed that the exc
ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1 connecting w/STOMP 1.2.
I have noticed that the exception messages that can be returned via an
ERROR frame can vary in format for the same exception type depending on
where in the source it originated.
In my STOMP client I parse out the message header of the ERROR frame
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Jerry Cwiklik wrote:
> What are the consequences of using closeAsync="false"?
Setting async to false means that the socket close call is blocking and is
not handled in a separate thread.
This is preferable and common in web applications where STOMP clients, sa
Hi,
Building ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1.
The generated .gitignore file contains an entry like 'data/'.
This entry causes matches against a sizeable chunk of the
activemq-amq-store sub-project which are then excluded from the commit to
one's local repo.
You won't notice it until someone checks o
we can get that into
> ActiveMQ 5.x as well?
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding the configuration of heart beating the STOMP protocol spec
> > states:
> >
> > "- because of timing inaccu
Hi,
Regarding the configuration of heart beating the STOMP protocol spec states:
"- because of timing inaccuracies, the receiver SHOULD be tolerant and
take into account an error margin"
How 'tolerant' does ActiveMQ determine it will be when calculating its
'error margin' regarding the arriv
Any of the illuminati have thoughts about my observations that they could
share?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Paul Gale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been experimenting with failover using the Master/Slave shared
> storage strategy. I have a custom lease locker (shown in the e
Hi,
The page http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb.html has some content missing in
the section entitled "Slow file system access diagnostic logging". Can
someone correct this?
Thanks,
Paul
Hi,
I have been experimenting with failover using the Master/Slave shared
storage strategy. I have a custom lease locker (shown in the example below)
that correctly obtains the lock within a couple of seconds of when the
other broker dies. However, depending on the value of the other settings
for
Hi,
The STOMP protocol definition does not specify a set of legal
characters for the login and passcode headers (that I can see) on the
CONNECT frame.
However, I was wondering whether ActiveMQ enforces any restrictions
regarding the set of legal characters for the two headers mentioned,
and other
I see. I didn't realize you were using the old deprecated
KahaPersistenceAdapter.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:43 PM, zhjt80 wrote:
> I upgrade the CentOS form 6.0 to 6.2, the high CPU issue is gone.
>
> I think the KahaPersistenceAdapter default already include the share file
> lock, we don't need
Shouldn't there be a Shared File Locker element defined inside your
kahaPersistenceAdapter?
See this page for examples:
http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:29 PM, zhjt80 wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply, Ceposta.
>
> I tested with below scenes
Please post the contents of your activemq.xml config file.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:44 PM, zhjt80 wrote:
> Could anybody help me ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-7-master-salve-nfs4-both-active-tp4669415p4669470.html
> Sent from th
usage which is used for non-persistent messages.
>
> If you have a scenario where producer and consumer are equally fast and you
> don't expect messages to pile up in your broker then you can go with fairly
> low values for each of the settings above.
>
> Hope this helps a bit.
Hi,
Is there a known algorithm or best practice folks use for determining
values for memory usage, store usage and temp usage for a broker with
a known JVM heap size?
I assume said algorithm would require as input the projected number of
producers and consumers, average message size, message thro
I'm confused. It appears that there are two of you asking for nearly
identical advice on the same email thread.
Are you guys working together on the same problem or are these
completely unrelated?
I cannot tell whose problems I'm answering or how your respective
situations differ.
Thanks,
Paul
On
Hi,
Has anyone experimented with using the JDBC storage adapter with a
MySQL back-end that's configured to use HandlerSocket? If so, I would
love to hear about your experiences.
For those who don't know about HandlerSocket it brings NoSQL
functionality to MySQL whilst still supporting simplified
Try removing: -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
In the 'ActiveMQ in Action' book it states (emphasis mine): "Don’t
let the name of this property fool you, as it enables the JMX agent
for local access ONLY."
Remote access can only be granted once
"com.sun.management.jmxremote.port" is assigned a v
Yeah, the "createConnector" attribute should be 'false' to prevent
ActiveMQ from creating its own connector and instead use the one
created by the JVM.
It would also help if you set each broker's 'brokerName' attribute to
something unique (defaults to 'localhost' otherwise) to differentiate
them i
Hi,
Using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 and STOMP 1.2.
How should a STOMP based producer that wishes to honor PFC do so? By
using the 'receipt' header in the SEND frame?
Are there any other things the STOMP producer must do to participate in PFC?
Thanks,
Paul
Hi,
Here http://activemq.apache.org/stomp.html it states that to
enable/disable STOMP tracing you should do the following:
log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp=TRACE, stomp
# enable this line and disable the above if you just want the frame IO.
#log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq.transp
Hi,
I've read where message cursors should be used when PFC is turned off or
for when consumers fall behind producers. The doc states that in the normal
case, so-called, where consumers keep up with producers, does not involve a
pending cursor of any kind. The configured cursor is only engaged whe
Apparently adding useJDBCCompliantTimezoneShift=true on the mysql
connector URL fixes it.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When setting this value to 1000, say, on a lease database locker I've
> noticed that the method determineTimeDifference always r
Hi,
When setting this value to 1000, say, on a lease database locker I've
noticed that the method determineTimeDifference always reports that
our MySQL database server is four hours ahead. They're not.
Is this a bug or does the mysql jdbc driver need to be configured some
particular way to make i
lly well (much easier to keep track of and work with
> than google groups so far); but if folks really really want a google
> group we can spin one up; but so far we've found github issues tend to
> be easier for folks to create, edit, open/close/comment on etc
>
> On 1 Jul
Does anyone know of if there's a dedicated mailing list for communicating
with the committers of Hawt.IO?
The only means of communication I can see are the issue list on the Github
page and some IRC channel, neither of which are particularly useful.
It seems a lot has changed with the latest down
ld be about
that.
I built my locally copy with 1.6.0_45. That should be ok, right?
Thanks,
Paul
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Christian Posta
wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Looks like Build-Jdk: 1.6.0_37
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
>
> > Hi,
Hi,
After reading the build instructions for ActiveMQ here:
http://activemq.apache.org/building.html
I'm wondering what was the _exact_ version of Java that was used to build
the release version of 5.8.0?
Thanks,
Paul
Hi,
On this page of the doc:
http://activemq.apache.org/manage-durable-subscribers.html
it states the following:
"Some applications send message with specified time to live. If those
messages are kept on the broker for the offline durable subscriber we need
to remove them when they reach their e
gcInactiveDestinations is defined as delete inactive destinations that are
empty. An empty destination is not the only criteria under which I want a
destination to be deleted.
Is there a setting, or combination of settings, that will automatically
delete a destination that's not empty but has not
g
> > threads and reduce the time spent in the thread that actually writes to
> the
> > journal. The write stat window is for logging purposes to get an idea of
> an
> > avg size of write batches per WRITE_STAT_WINDOW writes.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On
Hi,
I came across the following system properties that are uses by the
kahaDBPersistenceAdapter, their default values are:
-Dorg.apache.kahadb.journal.appender.WRITE_STAT_WINDOW=0
-Dorg.apache.kahadb.journal.CALLER_BUFFER_APPENDER=false
A particular unit test recommends setting them to:
-Dorg.a
Hi,
I have some questions regarding this option as the documentation is next to
useless on this:
1. What items are retained in this cache? The documentation just calls
the items 'values'.
2. Is a separate cache maintained per destination?
3. What behavior does cache size influence?
Would it make a difference if you used the JDBCIOExceptionHandler instead
of the default one perhaps? Just a thought.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:35 PM, afant wrote:
> I just tried the 5.9 nightly snapshot. On my broker I set
> restartAllowed="true". Then, I tried to start the
Anyone have any thoughts on how to fix this issue on 5.3.1?
Thanks,
Paul
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
> However, I am using ActiveMQ 5.3.1 which I believe only supports STOMP
> 1.0. I thought that STOMP 1.1 support was only introduced in ActiveMQ
> 5.4.x? My sit
For STOMP 1.0, ActiveMQ will treat unsubscribes using subscriptionName ==
> clientId.
> If you try to unsubscribe with STOMP 1.1, it will work properly.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Paul Gale wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > (Yes, I know this version is ancient
Hi,
(Yes, I know this version is ancient but it's still in use around here.
We're in the process of upgrading to 5.8.0).
Per the doc it states that it's a requirement for STOMP clients that want
to create durable topic subscription to ensure that the client-id and
subscription name match. What's
The 'tmpDataDirectory' attribute on the broker tag can specify the location
of the temp storage.
Example:
Thanks,
Paul
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:27 PM, fenbers wrote:
> I get an eror on AMQ startup that I request 1gb of temporary store limit
> but
> only 500mb are available on ${activemq_
Perhaps the options wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration and
wireFormat.maxInactivityDurationInitalDelay might help?
http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-wire-formats.html
Thanks,
Paul
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:12 PM, manua wrote:
> HI,
>
> I am using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 setup on Amazon EC2 Ubuntu i
One way to see is to start ActiveMQ in console mode:
./bin/activemq console
and read the debug output that appears on the screen.
Thanks,
Paul
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Christian Posta
> wrote:
> > Yah, you can set environment var
Stunned silence.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Paul
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed some unexplained behavior when using the web-console in 5.8.0
> to delete either topics or queues. This is NOT the infamous CSRF attack
&g
(JmxMBeanServer.java:639)
jvm 1| at
javax.management.MBeanServerInvocationHandler.invoke(MBeanServerInvocationHandler.java:263)
jvm 1| ... 56 more
Thanks,
Paul
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed some unexplained behavior when
Hi,
I've noticed some unexplained behavior when using the web-console in 5.8.0
to delete either topics or queues. This is NOT the infamous CSRF attack
question.
FYI: the credentials entered when accessing the web-console are the same as
those found in jmx.access/jmx.password.
Steps to reproduce.
>I saw this document from here
http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-master-slave.html and i think in here they
allow brokers to have more than 2.
>Did i misunderstand what you mean?
In master-slave you can have as many brokers as you want, regardless of the
storage strategy in use. However, there can o
ly specified what the option
prefix should be.
Ideally allowing non-prefixed options should become a deprecated 'feature'
and eventually obsoleted, thus mandating that options be fully qualified.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Paul
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Christian Posta wrote:
the ActiveMQConnectionFactory.
> > What client are you using to connect with JMS?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Paul Gale
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Can the following options also be used on a
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
