Re: ActiveMQ CPP disconnect While Debugging

2009-10-21 Thread Michael Dehmlow
using large numbers however, though I can not think of a reason why you wouldn't want to wait forever (-1). Michael Dehmlow wrote: > > Tried starting my client with: > tcp://localhost:61616? > wireFormat=openwire&tcpNoDelayEnabled=true&wireFormat.Max

Re: ActiveMQ CPP disconnect While Debugging

2009-10-19 Thread Michael Dehmlow
vior. Timothy Bish wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 07:48 -0700, Michael Dehmlow wrote: >> If I debug an activemq-cpp enabled application using visual studio 9.0 it >> appears I get kicked of the broker if I'm broken for more then about 20 >> seconds once I resume

CMS Interface vs Active MQ interface

2009-10-06 Thread Michael Dehmlow
We are using active mq 3.0.1 for a while now and a debate has started as to what interface to use when implementing a client. Is the goal of the cms interface to segregate the caller from an implementation specific interface(activeMQ)? Is there any performance lost or gained by using the cms inter

ActiveMQ CPP disconnect While Debugging

2009-09-30 Thread Michael Dehmlow
If I debug an activemq-cpp enabled application using visual studio 9.0 it appears I get kicked of the broker if I'm broken for more then about 20 seconds once I resume the application again. This is very annoying as it may take a while to get into a particular state and if you spend too long stepi

Re: setTransportlistener missing from activemq cpp

2009-08-13 Thread Michael Dehmlow
Timothy Bish wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:04 -0700, Michael Dehmlow wrote: >> According to the failover docs for Java one should use the failover >> transport >> listener to receive notifications that a failover has occured. >> >> I can not find the

setTransportlistener missing from activemq cpp

2009-08-13 Thread Michael Dehmlow
According to the failover docs for Java one should use the failover transport listener to receive notifications that a failover has occured. I can not find the interface to set a failover listener on the ActiveMQConnectionFactory as suggested by the documentation. Can you do this, and how? If

Re: Can't Connect to broker using stomp on activemq cpp 3.0.1

2009-08-03 Thread Michael Dehmlow
performance optimaization ideas? Timothy Bish wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 16:14 -0700, Michael Dehmlow wrote: >> Hello I'm trying to connect a 5.2.0 Active mq broker using the 3.0.1 cpp >> client. >> >> I can connect send and receive fine when I use openwire:

Can't Connect to broker using stomp on activemq cpp 3.0.1

2009-07-31 Thread Michael Dehmlow
Hello I'm trying to connect a 5.2.0 Active mq broker using the 3.0.1 cpp client. I can connect send and receive fine when I use openwire: tcp://localhost:61616?wireFormat=openwire But if I use stomp: tcp://localhost:61613?wireFormat=stomp I send messages and never receive them. My initial tho

Re: AMQ Client/Server Compatibility

2009-07-13 Thread Michael Dehmlow
Are you talking AMQ client 2.4.x or 2.5.x or the client contained AMQ Package 4.x or 5.x? rajdavies wrote: > > No - you need to update to version 4 (preferably 5) > > On 13 Jul 2009, at 19:02, Michael Dehmlow wrote: > >> >> Does AMQ 2.2.6 Client work with AMQ 5.2

AMQ Client/Server Compatibility

2009-07-13 Thread Michael Dehmlow
Does AMQ 2.2.6 Client work with AMQ 5.2 Server? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-Client-Server-Compatibility-tp24466475p24466475.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.