Jon-
First question—
A. Is the goal to get the same message to all users? ie.. 100 messages each go
to 10 users.
B. Is it to get the correct subset of messages to each user? ie.. 100
messages, 10 different message to 10 users.
For A, you want Topics, or Virtual Topics
For B, you want som
Something to keep in mind— different clustering options provide different
capabilities. Network of Brokers provides scaling, reduced latency for the
“next” message to be processed (fault tolerance), while Master-Slave / LevelDB
replication provide high availability of messages that have yet to b
You have better management and control (multi-threading, throttling, logging,
etc) over using a Camel route vs ActiveMQ’s JMS bridge. Camel is very
lightweight, so I wouldn’t expect it to have any measurable performance impact
in real world scenarios.
On Jul 25, 2014, at 8:44 PM, pminearo wrot
The command line uses the JMX service as well. Another option is to use a
destination policy for “garbage collection”. ActiveMQ has the ability to
automatically delete unused destinations:
http://activemq.apache.org/delete-inactive-destinations.html
On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:48 AM, rajashreekhare w
All-
Media Driver is excited to announce support for delegated administration for
Apache ActiveMQ in the Media Driver Integrated Console.
Feature highlights:
- Supports multiple versions of ActiveMQ from one centralized installation:
Apache ActiveMQ 5.7.x, 5.8.x, 5.9.x as well as the Red
I can only think of edge cases where you would want to setup everything on the
client side before making the connection.start() call. Generally, I
instantiate the .start() right away.
-Matt
On Jun 14, 2014, at 3:19 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> So this bit me… mostly because I'm new to activemq
Kevin-
Yeah, for general enterprise messaging usage, your best bet is to use ActiveMQ.
Its features set is fuller, and there are more frequent releases.
-Matt
On Jun 13, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> Ah… ok.. That's interesting. Perhaps I need to have my code on activemq
> and not