ain wrote:
> Great, thanks for reporting back.
>
> Tim
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Martin C. wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> sorry for the late response, missed the message. We are currently very
>> confident that the issue was triggered because one of the c
Hello,
sorry for the late response, missed the message. We are currently very
confident that the issue was triggered because one of the client
applications was still using a very old 5.7 library to connect to the
5.12 broker. Once we updated the client library in that particular
application, thing
Hi,
We've ran into some problems since we updated to Activemq 5.12.1. Our
most busy queue has stuck messages which also do NOT expire.
The queue has around 200 producers (each producer has it's own message
group, making sure messages of a producer do not overtake each other)
which send non-persist
Hi,
This might point you in the right direction, but not sure:
>
>
> http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html
Thanks, I will have a look at this and try to apply it to our situation.
> Is this something that can be recreated consistently?
>
Unfortunately
Hi,
We use a ActiveMQ network-of-brokers accross rather unstable WAN links and
use SSL with server/client certificates to protect the data. It is a
typical star architecture. On the unreliable links, some of the brokers
lose connection to the central broker and fail to re-establish the
connection
in the temp-store seems to not be freed.
Best regards,
Martin
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Martin C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in one of the instances I didn't find anything in the broker log, just in
> the client log, in the second log I found the same log entry in both cl
in the store till they are needed.
>
> On 27 August 2012 10:59, Martin C. wrote:
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > sorry for getting back to this rather old issue, but I just got an issue
> in
> > the field (twice) with the configuration below. The broker stopped
> &g
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Gary Tully wrote:
> yes.
>
> On 16 November 2011 12:01, Martin C. wrote:
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > thanks for the very fast response. I will change the configuration
> > accordingly. So basica
Hi Gary,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Gary Tully wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> that will be problematic because it will lead to a clash of clientids
> used by the network connectors.
> In your current setup on 5.5.0, can you inspect (on central) the
> client id of some of the connected satellite netw
Hi Gary,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Gary Tully wrote:
> the combination of networkConnector *name* attribute and brokerName of
> a network needs to be unique.
Can in a network of brokers the individual brokers have the same names
(as long as they have different IP addresses obviously)? Th
Hi,
yes, this is possible.
Best regards,
Martin
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:27 PM, yilativs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to reads several messages from queue/topic in ONE XA
> transaction,
> write the messages to an other source (database) in same XA transaction,
> remove all messages from
Hi,
expiration and persistence are something different. A persistent
message can still expire, a non-expiring message can still be
non-persistent.
The difference is: if a message is persistent, it will be available
even if the broker restarts, if a message has an expiration, it will
be deleted if
Hi,
have a look at the maxInactivityDuration setting when configuring the
transport. OpenWire for instance sends heartbeat packages when the
connection is idle.
http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-wire-formats.html
Best regards,
Martin
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Zagan wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
I am aware that there is no way in the official STOMP protocol to get
the broker-side message-id of a sent message. But since ActiveMQ
supports some other non-standard extensions, is there a way for 5.5.1
to get the server-side message-id as part of the Receipt frame maybe?
Thanks in advance!
Hi,
you are right, I just read to sloppy, and as most of the traffic on
this list is about the Java part, I simply jumped to the wrong
language in my mind. In my C++ implementations I use the same
recommendation as from Ivan Pechorin, I set the cms::ExceptionListener
and have built a very similar
Hi,
I'd tend to use Spring's SingleConnectionFactory with
reconnectOnException set to true. I'd compare my cached connection
against the one returned by the SingleConnectionFactory to know if any
other consumer encountered a JMS exception.
Basically I'd also treat any JMSException I encounter as
Hi,
please first ensure your network setup is correct by simply trying to
each other's ports via telnet. I think you still have some basic
networking issues here.
Please also beware that you seem to not create duplex connections,
which means that you have to create a connection from both sides.
Hi,
one of our installations suffered a power-outage that seems to have
corrupted parts of the filesystem. I am missing the db.free file from
the KahaDB directory, which now prevents startup. Is there a way from
recovering from this missing file?
The situation is in this case not particularly a p
sconnected, by the session being timed-out.
>
> Is there a way to cancel the subscriptions on this destination
> programmatically? As at this point in the app I am sure there are no
> clients and I just want to clean up.
>
> Many thanks again for your input.
>
> Kevin.
>
curs.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Kevin.
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Martin C. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> if TotalMessageCount is not decreasing, this indicates that you are
>> either not consuming or maybe not committing the consuming tran
Hi,
if TotalMessageCount is not decreasing, this indicates that you are
either not consuming or maybe not committing the consuming transaction
/ not acknowledging the messages on the receiving side (depends on
your acknowledge mode).
Best regards,
Martin
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Kevin Ki
Hi,
are you using failover-transport? If yes, you'll need to add a
"timeout" parameter to the connection URL, as the default behavior of
the failover transport is to wait indefinitely for a reconnect to the
broker. Please see
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html for
further
> with kahaDB.
>
> On 16 November 2011 10:26, Martin C. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I a have a question regarding fileQueueCursor and systemUsage on
>> ActiveMQ 5.5.0: Below you see my configuration, which limits the
>> memory to 64MB, store usage to 10GB and tempUsa
Hi,
I a have a question regarding fileQueueCursor and systemUsage on
ActiveMQ 5.5.0: Below you see my configuration, which limits the
memory to 64MB, store usage to 10GB and tempUsage to 1GB.
I have a KahaDB with about 30 messages, using 330MB in the kahadb
directory, all messages are persist
Hi,
the only reason for the 5.5.1 release was
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3491, which actually is the
removal of the Camel Web part, as it introduces a dependency to a LGPL
library, which AFAIK is in violation of the Apache guidelines for
allowed external libraries.
Best regards,
Ma
Hi,
what transport are you using? If you are using the failover transport,
look at the failover options at
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html,
especially at the timeout. I noticed that the sendTimeout is not
always used when using a failover transport, if the connection i
g useful to it:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3540
>
> James
>
> On 13 October 2011 07:18, Martin C. wrote:
>
>> I reported a similar issue back in January
>> (
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Possible-Bug-quot-Deleting-inactive-destination-quot-wi
I reported a similar issue back in January
(http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Possible-Bug-quot-Deleting-inactive-destination-quot-with-pending-messages-td3229098.html).
Unfortunately I never got an answer. It seems to me there might be a
bug. I never raised a Jira issue, though. We just stoppe
Hi,
you should use JmsTemplate to send messages only. Have a look at
http://activemq.apache.org/jmstemplate-gotchas.html. You should use
Spring's DefaultMessageListenerContainer to receive messages. We are
using this, it works well.
Best regards,
Martin
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:47 PM, James Blac
QMessage and override
> org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQMessage#onSend
>
> on that callback, you will have the messageId and be able to commit
> the db transaction. On return from that method the message will be
> sent.
> be sure and call super.onSend() though.
>
> On 22 September 2
Hi,
I'd like to know the message ID of a message I am going to send before
actually sending it. Is this possible?
Reason is that I want to delay sending the JMS messages until my
database transaction has been comitted, but I already want to record
the message IDs as correlation IDs in exactly thi
Hi,
you may look into "retroactive consumers" and "retroactive
subscriptions". For a starting point, visit
http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html and
http://activemq.apache.org/subscription-recovery-policy.html
Best regards,
Martin
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, stratio wrote:
Hi,
we use a network-of-broker configuration with a central broker and a
lot of hubs, all using ActiveMQ 5.5.0. Today, one of the bridges
collapsed and could not be re-established. Below you see the log-file.
You can see, that first a client connection failed with "Cannot send,
channel has already
Hi,
first, you can use JMX on the broker to disconnect the connection of
the hanging consumer. But this is a very rude work-around, of course.
We had a similar issue connecting with Java-based consumers. We seem
to have found a work-around by disabling caching and tight encoding on
the OpenWire w
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Thanks! Slightly different question. Is there any reason why one
> shouldn't use vm transport?
Often it is sensible to have the broker as an external running
application, so it is available for procuders / consumers in other
processes e
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:47 PM, agujral wrote:
> Sorry I was not very clear in my initial post. I want to know if consumer
> count is zero even if I dont know the queue name. The above mentioned checks
> will work only when I know the queuename which I dont know in this
> particular case.
Hi,
besides the advisory approach you can use JMX and monitor the
"ConsumerCount" property of any
"org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=BROKER_NAME,Type=Queue,Destination=QUEUE_NAME"
MBean. You need to replace the ALL_CAPS tokens with correct values.
Best regards,
Martin
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:09
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:21 PM, pwanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have also an other broker (same very simple config master/slave on SAN)
> for an other app, with a queue and only one consumer that is configured with
> Camel (see config below), and this consumer also stop consuming messages,
> thu
Hi,
The only issue with Spring's DefaultMessageListenerContainer we have
encountered with prefetch 0 was that the stop() method caused threads
to keep hanging in the DefaultMessageListenerContainer on shutdown,
because the receive(timeout) call of ActiveMQ uses a non-timed-out
read to the broker i
Hi,
When reviewing ActiveMQ code, I see a lot of special treatment for the
prefetch=0 case. What exactly is the conceptual difference between 1
and 0 prefetch?
We are currently using prefetch=0 via failover, but are in the process
of migrating away from failover to multiple connections with Sprin
Hi,
it sounds to me that it simply takes that long for the STOMP protocol
to realize that the connection died. Maybe you can enable
tcp.keepalive on the connection via the configuration URL?
You might also have a look at the keepalive options for your transport
connection, and if you are on Linux
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:18 PM, SketchCND
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I don't believe that this issue is on the client side.
[...]
Hmm, I suppose you are right and I think my reply might have been
meant for another topic. I just need to find it again. Sorry!
Best regards,
Hi,
I just noticed I got the documentation for the C++ project, but I
suppose there will be similar settings for the broker itself.
Best regards,
Martin
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Martin C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe http://activemq.apache.org/cms/configuring.html can help,
> es
Hi,
maybe http://activemq.apache.org/cms/configuring.html can help,
especially the wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration setting. But I don't
know if/how it applies to STOMP connections, but I would also be very
interested in this, as it might be that I need to connect some clients
via STOMP.
Best reg
Hi,
I haven't done much work with durable subscriptions yet, but as far as
I understand the topic in connection with producer flow control, it is
guaranteed that no message is lost for any of the persistent
subscriptions. As you have stopped a subscription and once you hit a
configured storage lim
Hi,
> So it sounds like the current Message Groups behaviour is fine; its
> just you want to ensure fair load balancing of the message groups
> across consumers right? So if lots of other clients are restarted; the
> long running clients could end up claiming too many of the message
> groups?
Yes
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, boday wrote:
> Martin, message groups (by design) guarantee that only a single consumer will
> process messages for a group at a time.
Yes, I am aware of that. My problem at the moment is only, that it
will always be the SAME consumer processing the message gr
for a group. Would serve to better randomize the
> load across consumers to protect against slow consumers, etc...
>
>
> Martin C. wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we currently use message groups to ensure ordered delivery of messages
>> within a given group. As not
Hi,
we currently use message groups to ensure ordered delivery of messages
within a given group. As noted on the documentation for message
groups, this often does not scale very well with variable consumer
counts, as in this case the oldest consumers will hog all message
groups.
In our use-case,
Hi,
we plan a setup with lots of remote sites, each of them having their
own broker which are then connected via a network-of-brokers via a
duplex connector. We'd like to use dynamicallyIncludedDestinations,
but even in our small test installation we already see huge amounts of
advisory messages.
Hi,
Have a look at http://activemq.apache.org/delete-inactive-destinations.html
This might be what you want.
Best regards,
Martin
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:00 PM, James Green wrote:
> Not sure this is even possible?
>
> We dynamically create our queues by pushing messages to channels with
> ac
Hi,
first: I'm sure you'll need to test it using your data-store (you
could attempt to create a crash-consistent store by simply copying
your KahaDB directory).
I have had some deployments that went from 5.3.2-fuse to 5.4.2 and now
5.5.0, without losing any messages in the queue. So basically, it
NC_ durable clients that had long been disposed of by
> ourselves. After deleting these the subsequent expiring / purging run of
> kahadb removed the files and freed up literally gigs of space.
>
> Hope this helps. It should really be documented as a FAQ!
>
> James
>
> On 4 Ju
Hi,
just as further input: have you checked you didn't declare an
exclusive consumer and you didn't use message groups?
Best regards,
Martin
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:38 PM, joe smith wrote:
> Hi Edan,
>
> Yes. with the springframework's PrefetchPolicy bean, I've used both values.
> Unfortuna
Hi,
have a look at
http://download.oracle.com/javaee/1.4/api/javax/jms/MessageProducer.html#send(javax.jms.Message,
int, int, long) on how to send messages with a time-to-live set.
Best regards,
Martin
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:00 PM, agujral wrote:
> Hi All,
> We are using active mq as
Hi,
I experience the problem that over time my KahaDB storage fills up
despite almost no queue showing pending messages. I upgraded from
ActiveMQ 5.4.2 to 5.5.0 because I thought that according to the change
log these leaks in KahaDB should be fixed in 5.5.0, but for me it
seems they aren't. What
Hi,
Prefetching only applies when consuming messages.
Best regards,
Martin
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:12 PM, lernen.2007
wrote:
> I need your help.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-stuck-in-queue-tp3244342p3526298.html
> Sent from the Activ
Hi,
you broker's persistence settings are only used if you send your
messages as persistent and not as non-persistent. See
http://download.oracle.com/javaee/1.4/api/javax/jms/MessageProducer.html
for persistence settings. The JMS default is persistent, but I don't
know how you configured your fram
Hi,
are you using persistent or non-persistent delivery for your messages?
Any non-persistent message will be discarded on broker restart
(however, I don't know why it would go to the storage in the first
place, though).
And are you using a time-to-live on your messages, which might have
expired
Hi,
the JMS threading model is based around the Session. Each Session is
to be used by one thread. If you are using asynchronous mode (you
register a MessageListener with the Session), every Session uses one
thread or is to be used by one thread
(http://download.oracle.com/javaee/1.4/api/javax/jms
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> In your setup, when one of the networked brokers goes
> down it becomes (looks like) a very slow consumer.
Is there a way to "de-register" a broker in such a scenario, if it
goes down intentionally "forever"?
Best regards,
Martin
Hi,
we are using prefetch=0 with Spring, works well, still we are seeing
the same issue but for _non-persistent_ messages. (With prefetch=0 and
with prefetch=1.) Any ideas if this could correlate to the issues
mentioned here?
As an interesting side-effect, the consumption starts again if we
delet
Hi,
one of my client is using XA using Atomikos, using a failover
connection with ActiveMQ 5.4.2 (broker and client). From time to time,
we see sporadic fails via the localhost connection (first question:
why?):
WARN org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport -
Transport (activemq
not sure if this really resolves the issue completely, but at
least it didn't happen again for several tenth of millions of messages
until now.
Best regards,
Martin
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Martin C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I investigated the issue further.
>
> In the corres
as if I cannot read the index for that destination. Rebuilding the
> index would probably help, but I would be great to figure if it is
> reproducible.
>
> On 17 April 2011 13:18, Martin C. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in one of my installations using 5.4.2 broker, I got
Hi,
one of my clients is using an XA connection inside a
SingleConnectionFactory to share the connection with about 150
consumers (in total) in about 10 different Spring
DefaultMessageListenerContainers.
As Spring is not working with prefetch=0, they are using prefetch=1,
but they now see out-of-
Hi,
in one of my installations using 5.4.2 broker, I got the following
exception, after processing of a message failed several times in a row
within XA transactions. The message never appeared in a DLQ and seems
to have been lost. Any ideas what could be causing this?
2011-04-17 13:41:59,353 | WA
to
the EOFException happening on the web-interface as well.
Should I search for the issue on the broker, the consumer or the
producer (my guess being the broker)? Any hints?
Thanks in advance,
Martin
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Martin C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as a follow-up, I'm curre
have to do with prefetch limit being
set to 1 and XA transactions (I read about issues with prefetch and
spring on the homepage, but this indicates that one should be a valid
limit).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Martin
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin C.
Date
> 3. Time to live : 30 (5 minutes)
I'm not sure and I haven't checked the source-code, but could it be
that the field is actually setting the timestamp when the message is
going to expire instead of the TTL?
Best regards,
Martin
Hi,
I am experiencing a corrupt message (see stacktrace below) which fails
when attempting to access the message's properties. We had this on two
occurances until now, both on a 5.3.2 broker. The issue happens
persists on 5.4.2, if we start it with the KahaDB datastore of the
5.3.2 instance. The m
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:48 PM, xjchwork wrote:
>
> thanks,Martin.We use the default , AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE.
in this case I'd try upgrading to one of the bugfix releases of the
5.3.x series, or to the latest 5.4.2 if possible. But I don't know if
the issue has been addressed but lots of message
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:29 PM, lernen.2007
wrote:
>
> The problem is how can we delete all messages in a queue if we have a out of
> memory. Is there any possiblity to delete messages?
you could either purge it via the web-interface or via JMX from inside
your code.
Best regards,
Martin
Hi,
I don't see which acknowledge mode you are using, but beware that you
need to call session.recover() as indicated in the JMS specification
in order to start redelivery of messages, if there is an exception
(see http://download.oracle.com/javaee/1.4/api/javax/jms/Session.html).
This is at least
Hi,
lately I recognize sporadic EOFExceptions while being connected to the
broker which runs on localhost (activemq1).
2011-02-03 13:44:14,200 [ActiveMQ Transport:
ssl://activemq1/127.0.0.1:61617] WARN
org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport - Transport
(activemq1/127.0.0.1:6161
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 4:10 AM, mgfarme wrote:
> Why do we get different behavior on queues than on topics ? I
> can put a message on a queue with no subscribers, and see it timeout after
> the TTL value.
Because that is the defined semantics of a queue. Queues must hold the
messages
Hi,
I am currently experimenting with removal of inactive destinations and I
think I found an issue, but I want to confirm if this can be reproduced by
anybody else before filing a bug in the issue tracker:
I have
which is rather short inactivity timeout, but just for testing.
If I use the w
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:44 PM, ChicagoBob123 wrote:
>
> Why is this queue created to hold messages that have timed out? Is there a
> way to avoid this?
Please have a look at
http://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling.html,
especially at the section "Automatically Disca
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM, pp wrote:
> For activemq must we have the broker(activemq) at every subscriber's server
> ?
No, you just need one server (broker) to which all clients connect to.
Best regards,
Martin
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> But I cannot find a way to show those properties in the web console. Is this
> a configuration issue?
As far as I remember looking into the code in one of the 3.1.x
versions, the JMSXUserID is not part of the regular attributes
collec
Hi,
thanks for the very fast answer.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> The memoryUsage above should limit the entire broker to 256mb of
> memory. I just tested this by lowering the memoryUsage limit to 15mb
Hi,
I'm a little bit confused by all the memory limit options available in
ActiveMQ, maybe someone could help me. I primarily send non-persistent
messages, and I'd like them to be spooled to disk in case a global memory
limit is reached.
Basically, I'd like to set a global limit of 256MB for all
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:21 PM, BenXS wrote:
> Can I use the same (unchanged) java bean to consume jms msgs from a(nother)
> topic instead from the previous queue?
Yes, this should work.
You only have to be aware of the changed semantics and delivery guarantees.
Best regards,
Martin
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Gary Tully wrote:
>
> you need a message producer and do producer.send(..., message);
>
will this also preserve the message ID or will a new message ID be
used for this message? I am interested as I may need to forward some
messages to another broker and I'd
Hi,
Thanks for the pointer!
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> filePendingMessagecursor is your man here, and configure a systemUsage
> memory limit that controls how much memory resources are consumed by
> the cursors before offloading to the local filesystem kicks in.
>
Could you provide a simple confi
Hi,
I'm operating a SSL-based broker which is going to be connected by several
thousand clients. As the SSL-transport is based on the TCP-transport, it
seems that any connection is using its own thread. Is there any way to get
SSL via NIO and using a worker thread for handling the connections?
B
Hi,
Martin C. wrote:
>
> At the moment, I am using a Spring JmsTemplate approach. The Spring
> JmsTemplates work with polling (i.e. blocking call on receive()) and sets
> up the transaction before. This works fine.
>
I've now put together a very minimal example of what I
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> There needs to be some JTA wrapper on the activemq session that will start
> a
> transaction and enlist the activemq XAResource for you. For Atomikos I
> think
> it is something like:
>
> class="com.atomikos.jms.AtomikosConnectionFactoryBe
Hi,
I am trying to use Atomikos-based JTA together with Spring to use
distributed transactions.
Sending messages in an atomic way works fine, as the transaction is started
before sending a message via the message producer.
Unfortunately, I'm unable to get asynchronous message listeners (i.e. us
Martin C. wrote:
>
> After this, the call to send() hangs, instead of timing out due to either
> connection.sendTimeout or timeout. This is rather unfortunate for me,
> because possibly "infinite" hangs are not what I want, but want to switch
> to some sort of "o
Hi,
I am using the failover transport with an URL constructed like the
following:
url << "failover://(tcp://" << broker.ip << ":" << broker.port << ")?" <<
"randomize=false"
<< "&connection.sendTimeout=5000" <<
"&maxReconnectDelay=5000&timeout=3000";
I tried unexpected broker failures b
Hi
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:43 +0800, Sebastian Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Actually the transportInterrupted and transportResumed methods would be
> invoked if the Failover transport is in use and the connection drops,
> the client just needs to register a class that implemen
Hi,
I am using the failover transport in ActiveMQ-CPP and I'd like to know if
there is a similar way to monitor the state of the connection as in the Java
implemention, where you can register a TransportListener to the connection,
which in turn gets notified if the connection is currently interru
93 matches
Mail list logo
