Re: Failover and updateClusterClients

2010-06-24 Thread Mark White
rajdavies wrote: > > This is a new feature in 5.4 - so we are all newbies to it ;) - answers > inlined: > Ah. I just noticed that 5.4 is not yet in stable branch. I didn't realise these features were *that* new :) -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Failover-and-updateClus

Re: Failover and updateClusterClients

2010-06-24 Thread Mark White
> but on the client side - use tcp:// instead of nio - you will get better performance. Thanks for the advice on this, and the rest of your answer. Much appreciated. Mark... -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Failover-and-updateClusterClients-tp28967819p28979962.html Sent

Failover and updateClusterClients

2010-06-22 Thread Mark White
I'm a newbie at this, so please excuse any limitations in my understanding. We're looking at a load-balanced network of brokers with failover, using a fixed list of URIs with 4 servers (A - D). We'll be using a common config across brokers (except broker name). A JWS client will be used. Client: