Has anyone else run into an issue where ActiveMQ 5.18.4 starts
creating "“Exceeded
the maximum number of allowed client connections” errors one Kubernetes
1.30? Same code in 1.29 I've never seen this issue. Looking at the
connections list, I only see 5-6. I've seen this in AKS and an onprem
clus
I've setup multiple brokers that authenticate to each other via TLS
authentication. So far the identity has been the same key because the
usage is any. I need to use an internal CA to sign the certificate, and
the certificate will be marked as server auth only. I haven't tested out
using a serve
Hello all, I've got ActiveMQ classic 5.18.4 setup to require mutual client
authentication. When I create a keystore with a single private key and an
additional certificate and it generally works great. When I instead try to
use a single key for both the client and the server I get the following
e
>
>
> You can exclude the destinations which are problematic, mixing
> dynamic/exclude/static on the transport connector:
>
>
OK, so i can explicitly exclude destinations, but i can't limit which
destinations get included exclusively? OK, I can manage that. I can
exclude the DLQ at least so that
I've got two AMQ classic instances connected via :
AMQ1:
AMQ2:
Messages pushed to openunison.k8s.obj.dr get forwarded as expected and are
proce
Thanks Matt for the explanation. We have two scenarios we want to be able
to do:
1. In cluster HA - Right now we have one Deployment with a PVC. If the AMQ
dies the client app stops working until the AMQ deployment is back up.
It's not high volume at all. If I hear what you're saying, and have
>
>
>
>
> When you say "queue" do you mean a JMS queue?
Yes. (right now just from the admin interface).
> Why would you necessarily
> expect a queue created on one node to be created on a different node in the
> network?
This is the mental block i'm having. What my thought is that if a que
I've setup 3 brokers in Kubernetes as StatefulSets. Each one has its own
unique broker name. In each broker config I setup a
block similar to:
Each broker connects to the other 2. Once all three are running i can see
in the logs that they're connecting:
amq-orchestra
INFO |
I'm using org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSslConnectionFactory with the url
"failover:(ssl://host:port)?initialRreconnectDelay=1" and am seeing two
odd behaviors:
1. Every few minutes we're seeing the client re-establish connections
2. Eventually the server exceeds its connections and stops acce
I'm trying to connect activemq 5.13.4 to a mariadb 10.1 galera cluster. If
only one server is up and running everything is great. Once I bring up a
second server for fail over I get into a seesaw with lock timeouts. After
some googling I found:
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/codership-t
rc/test/java/org/apache/activemq/MessageListenerRedeliveryTest.java#L317
>
> an exception thrown from on message will force a rollback. There is an
> internal try catch around the up call to onMessage that traps and
> stores the exception.
>
> On 10 September 2014 16:38, Marc Boo
he
> cause property.
>
> On 10 September 2014 11:41, Marc Boorshtein wrote:
> > I'm trying to add a stacktrace to a message if its been rolled back as a
> > property. Is this possible?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Marc
>
>
>
> --
> http://redhat.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
I'm trying to add a stacktrace to a message if its been rolled back as a
property. Is this possible?
Thanks
Marc
able the Management Bean, but not
> > enable the TCP/IP port.
> >
> >
> >
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/management/ManagementFactory.html
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > On Sep 4, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Marc Boorshtein
> wrote:
> >
&
I have a system that uses activemq 5.8 as an embedded message queue (using
KahaDB). I'd like to expose some basic management functions via JMX but I
don't want to open a tcp/ip port. Can I craft a JMX URL similar to how I
create a connection factory (ActiveMQConnectionFactory cf = new
ActiveMQCon
All,
I'm looking to embed ActiveMQ 5.8 in my Java based server and I wanted to
confirm my thinking to make sure I was taking the right approach.
My desire is to have a VM accessible queue (not accessible via a network)
that is using a relational database (SQL Server 2012 in this instance).
The s
16 matches
Mail list logo