avoid
> split-brains. ARTEMIS-2716[1] should address your use case.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2716
>
> Regards,
> Domenico
>
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 06:10, Lewis Gardner
> wrote:
>
> > I have a 3-active/backup pair HA setup with each pa
I have a 3-active/backup pair HA setup with each pair on a separate network
segment.
Seg 1: Active-1 and Backup-3 (backup for Active-3)
Seg 2: Active-2 and Backup-1 (backup for Active-1)
Seg 3: Active-3 and Backup-2 (backup for Active-2)
I am using the "vote-on-replication-failure = true" option
omething you could provide a link
> to?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:46 PM Lewis Gardner
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the quick response, Justin.
> >
> > The "session-per-consumer and start() method" relates to this clause from
> &g
and indeterminate behavior.
>
> > Is a "session per consumer" approach OK?
>
> Generally speaking this approach is OK. However, I still don't understand
> how a session-per-consumer relates to when the start() method is invoked.
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1] h
All the online examples and those included in Artemis distribution register
all sessions, producers and consumers *before* starting the connection. I
have an application where topic consumers can "come and go" so I need to
either:
a) Create a new session for each new topic consumer or
b) Ignore th
