n delay or even data loss on the "idle" slave when it becomes
"active" as it doesn't have any replication going on before its start up,
especially in the scenario where the "active" slave fails shortly after the
master?
thanks,
Lei
--
View this message in c
the "active" slave was killed first, the secondary/"passive" slave is
not able to take over as the "active" slave
- only when the "passive" slave is restarted, it can become the "active"
slave to the master.
Is this by design? Or anything wrong w
We have a production deployment of activemq 5.12.0, and we need to check the
source code for some issues.
All the links to the 5.12.0 source code zip seem to be broken. Any one can
help to provide a valid link?
Thanks very much!
Lei
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324
the example folder coming along with the activemq
distribution. In the producer/client, I have this as the connection url:
But when I run the producer, it gives the following error.
Anybody has any idea what I did wrong?
Thanks,
Lei
[java] [Thread-1] Caught: javax.jms.JMSException: Could not
e activemq.xml:
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerName="sglJDBC"
persistent="true" destroyApplicationContextOnStop="true"
deleteAllMessagesOnStartup="true">
Anybody has any ide
ApplicationContextOnStop="true">
...
/x/home/jdoe/activemq/data/kahadb is a directory on the network, and not
local to the server the broker is started.
Thanks for any help and reply in advance!
Lei
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.co